2.4: A measurement of binocular color fusion limit in 3D displays

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (S1) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Qi Xiong ◽  
Kai Chen ◽  
Zaiqing Chen ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Junshen Shi
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 3222-3224
Author(s):  
Xiao-yan QIAN ◽  
Lei HAN ◽  
Bang-feng WANG

Displays ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Tencor Instruments
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (10) ◽  
pp. 11-13
Author(s):  
Chris Edwards
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen L. McCormack ◽  
Kathryn A. Kulowski

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-1-100-6
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Woods

Millions of Stereoscopic 3D capable TVs were sold into the consumer market from 2007 through to 2016. A wide range of display technologies were supported including rear-projection DLP, Plasma, LCD and OLED. Some displays supported the Active 3D method using liquid-crystal shutter glasses, and some displays supported the Passive 3D method using circularly polarised 3D glasses. Displays supporting Full-HD and Ultra-HD (4K) resolution were available in sizes ranging from 32" to 86" diagonal. Unfortunately display manufacturers eventually changed their focus to promoting other display technologies and 2016 was the last year that new 3D TVs were made for the consumer market. Fortunately, there are still millions of 3D displays available through the secondhand- market, however it can be difficult to know which displays have 3D display support. This paper will provide a listing of specifically Passive 3D TVs manufactured by LG, however it has been our experience that the 3D quality varied considerably from one display to another hence it is necessary to qualify the quality of the 3D available on these displays using a testing technique that will be described in the paper.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document