A Risk Arbitrage Strategy for Lotteries

Wilmott ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (100) ◽  
pp. 52-63
Author(s):  
Steven D. Moffitt ◽  
William T. Ziemba
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephane Dieudonne ◽  
Slimane Bouacha ◽  
Fabienne Cretin

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 929-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Cao ◽  
Bradley A. Goldie ◽  
Bing Liang ◽  
Lubomir Petrasek

AbstractTo understand the nature of hedge fund managers’ skills, we study the implementation of risk arbitrage by hedge funds using their portfolio holdings and comparing them with those of other institutional arbitrageurs. We find that hedge funds significantly outperform a naive risk-arbitrage portfolio by 3.7% annually on a risk-adjusted basis, whereas non–hedge fund arbitrageurs fail to outperform the benchmark. Our analysis reveals that hedge funds’ superior performance does not reflect fund managers’ ability to predict or affect the outcome of merger and acquisition deals; rather, hedge fund managers’ superior performance is attributed to their ability to manage downside risk.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephane Dieudonne ◽  
Fabienne Cretin ◽  
Slimane Bouacha

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Fabian Waldow ◽  
Matthias Schnaubelt ◽  
Christopher Krauss ◽  
Thomas Günter Fischer

In this paper, we demonstrate how a well-established machine learning-based statistical arbitrage strategy can be successfully transferred from equity to futures markets. First, we preprocess futures time series comprised of front months to render them suitable for our returns-based trading framework and compile a data set comprised of 60 futures covering nearly 10 trading years. Next, we train several machine learning models to predict whether the h-day-ahead return of each future out- or underperforms the corresponding cross-sectional median return. Finally, we enter long/short positions for the top/flop-k futures for a duration of h days and assess the financial performance of the resulting portfolio in an out-of-sample testing period. Thereby, we find the machine learning models to yield statistically significant out-of-sample break-even transaction costs of 6.3 bp—a clear challenge to the semi-strong form of market efficiency. Finally, we discuss sources of profitability and the robustness of our findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document