Hepatitis A Virus Sequence Detected in Clotting Factor Concentrates Associated With Disease Transmission

Biologicals ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty H. Robertson ◽  
Miriam J. Alter ◽  
Beth P. Bell ◽  
Bruce Evatt ◽  
Karen A. McCaustland ◽  
...  
Transfusion ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 573-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
JM Soucie ◽  
BH Robertson ◽  
BP Bell ◽  
KA McCaustland ◽  
BL Evatt

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (08) ◽  
pp. 572-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Lusher

IntroductionThe treatment of hemophilia A and B has improved considerably in recent years. The availability of hepatitis A and B vaccines, safer clotting factor concentrates (particularly recombinant factor VIII and recombinant factor IX concentrates), and synthetic agents, such as desmopressin,1 has resulted in earlier, more aggressive treatment and prophylactic regimens aimed at preventing chronic, debilitating joint disease.2-8There have been no new cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease attributable to clotting factor in North America since 1987, and documented instances of hepatitis transmission by clotting factor concentrates have been rare in the 1990s. Concerns remain that certain nonenveloped viruses, such as human parvovirus B19 and hepatitis A virus, can still be transmitted by some plasma-derived clotting factor concentrates,9and questions linger as to whether the agents causing Creutzfeld-Jacob disease (CJD) and new variant CJD might also be transmitted. Overall, however, the products available to treat hemophilia today are safer than ever before.An increasing number of persons with hemophilia are receiving exclusively recombinant (r) products, and manufacturers are now producing new, second-generation r-factor VIII products that are stabilized with sugars, rather than albumin, or are smaller, truncated molecules.10 Scientists are now designing specific changes into the factor VIII genes in an attempt to derive unique and improved forms of r-factor VIII.11 The next logical areas of focus are to bring to fruition the promise of an “unlimited supply” of r-factor VIII and r-factor IX products, to meet the needs of persons with hemophilia, not only in developed countries, but throughout the world, and to be able to cure hemophilia through gene therapy.As gene therapy trials begin in humans with hemophilia, the scientists involved, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and perhaps most importantly, members of the hemophilia community must decide which categories of affected individuals should be entered in these trials, particularly the earliest, Phase I trials. Who is most likely to benefit if gene therapy proves to be both effective and safe? Who should be the first patients to be enrolled in each new trial? Who is at greatest risk if something unexpected happens? What would be considered a good outcome? Clearly, some of these questions are more difficult to answer than others.


1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (02) ◽  
pp. 616-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
E P Mauser-Bunschoten ◽  
H L Zaaijer ◽  
A A J van Drimmelen ◽  
H M van den Berg ◽  
G Roosendaal ◽  
...  

SummaryRecently, clotting factor preparations transmitted hepatitis A virus (HAV) to hemophilia patients. To study the risk of HAV infection in Dutch hemophilia patients, serum samples of 341 patients with hemophilia were tested for HAV antibodies (anti-HAV).197/341 patients (group 1) were treated with clotting factor concentrates produced from large plasma pools, 144/341 patients (group 2) were treated with small pool cryoprecipitate. The test results were compared to those of healthy blood donors (n = 19,746) of the same age. In addition stored serum samples (1983-1994) from hemophilia patients were tested for HAV antibodies.No increased risk of HAV infection was found in Dutch hemophilia patients. The anti-HAV prevalence in group 1 was 20%, in group 213% and in blood donors 41%. A significantly (p <0.002) lower percentage of HAV antibodies was found in hemophilia patients born in the 1950s using cryoprecipitate (11%) as compared to blood donors of the same age (40%), probably caused by passive administration of anti-HAV through clotting product. Passive immunization in the past was significantly (p <0.02) more often found in group 2 (41.7%) than in group 1 (28%).In the period 1983 till 1988 five seroconversions were seen in group 1 (2%) and one in group 2 (0.7%). Anti-HAV seroconversions were not observed after 1988.In a risk analysis we estimated that 2 plasma pools of 10,000 Dutch blood donors per year may contain HAV. The absence of HAV among Dutch hemophilia patients suggests that this contamination is successfully inactivated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document