Information Exchange in Intensive Care: How can we Improve?

Author(s):  
B. Venkatesh ◽  
A. Miller ◽  
A. Karnik
Author(s):  
Michelle Helliwell

The goal of this study was to investigate the information needs of parents in a neonatal intensive care unit environment (NICU), and to uncover any gaps in the information exchange between parents and health care providers as perceived by parents of NICU patients. Brenda Dervin's sense-making theory was employed to test the idea that health care providers (HCPs) offered information . . .


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aalap C Shah ◽  
Daniel C Oh ◽  
Anna H Xue ◽  
John D Lang ◽  
Bala G Nair

Checklists are commonly used to structure the communication process between anesthesia nursing healthcare providers during the transfer of care, or handoff, of a patient after surgery. However, intraoperative information is often recalled from memory leading to omission of critical data or incomplete information exchange during the patient handoff. We describe the implementation of an electronic anesthesia information transfer tool (T2) for use in the handover of intubated patients to the intensive care unit. A pilot observational study auditing handovers against a pre-existing checklist was performed to evaluate information reporting and attendee participation. There was a modest improvement in information reporting on part of the anesthesia provider, as well as team discussions regarding the current hemodynamic status of the patient. While T2 was well-received, further evaluation of the tool in different handover settings can clarify its potential for decreasing adverse communication-related events.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S27-S28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Monsees ◽  
Lori Popejoy ◽  
Jennifer Goldman ◽  
Mary Anne Jackson ◽  
Brian R Lee

Abstract Background Increasing nurse engagement in Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) is a national initiative. We previously reported results from a stewardship survey where nurses indicated being confident to perform ASP practices, yet identified barriers to stewardship participation. Seventeen barriers were identified, with many centered around hospital culture such as lack of inclusion in rounds, power differentials, and nurse input not actively sought. To further understand organizational and cultural barriers which may influence nursing stewardship engagement, we used responses from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety survey to evaluate nursing perception on hospital culture. Methods Data from the 2017 AHRQ survey were used. Nurses working on noninpatient floors (e.g., post anesthesia care units) were excluded. For this analysis, we included 4 domains pertinent to stewardship initiatives: communication, information exchange, teamwork within and across units. Composite scores within each domain were calculated. Scores were stratified by Intensive Care Nursery (ICN), Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), Oncology (Onc), medical-surgical (med-surg) units, and dual units (e.g., float pool). Results A total of 424 nurses participated in the survey; 138 (33%) ICN, 90 (21%) PICU, 42 (10%) Onc, 168 (40%) med-surg, and 23, (5%) dual. The majority of nurses had been employed by the hospital for 0–5 years (237; 56%) with 76 (18%) having more than 15 years. The majority of nurses expressed neutrality with communication. Approximately 20% disagreed with the level of information exchange. Nurses perceived teamwork within a unit more favorably than teamwork across units. Responses were relatively consistent across units. Conclusion Successful ASP require interdisciplinary collaboration and communication. Barriers related to communicating and exchanging information may limit nursing engagement. Assessments already used at hospitals could potentially guide methods of integrating nurses into stewardship with AHRQ data offering another lens to assess factors influencing behaviors to steward. A thorough understanding of nurses’ perceived work climate may inform engagement strategies. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2007 ◽  
pp. 755-760
Author(s):  
B. Venkatesh ◽  
A. Miller ◽  
A. Karnik

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 1507-1515
Author(s):  
Lauren L. Madhoun ◽  
Robert Dempster

Purpose Feeding challenges are common for infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). While sufficient oral feeding is typically a goal during NICU admission, this can be a long and complicated process for both the infant and the family. Many of the stressors related to feeding persist long after hospital discharge, which results in the parents taking the primary role of navigating the infant's course to ensure continued feeding success. This is in addition to dealing with the psychological impact of having a child requiring increased medical attention and the need to continue to fulfill the demands at home. In this clinical focus article, we examine 3 main areas that impact psychosocial stress among parents with infants in the NICU and following discharge: parenting, feeding, and supports. Implications for speech-language pathologists working with these infants and their families are discussed. A case example is also included to describe the treatment course of an infant and her parents in the NICU and after graduation to demonstrate these points further. Conclusion Speech-language pathologists working with infants in the NICU and following hospital discharge must realize the family context and psychosocial considerations that impact feeding progression. Understanding these factors may improve parental engagement to more effectively tailor treatment approaches to meet the needs of the child and family.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 191-191
Author(s):  
Murugesan Manoharan ◽  
Sachin Vyas ◽  
Rajinikanth Ayyathurai ◽  
Alan M. Nieder ◽  
Mark S. Soloway

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document