Studying Social Information Spaces

Author(s):  
Danyel Fisher
2014 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 549-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Matschke ◽  
Johannes Moskaliuk ◽  
Franziska Bokhorst ◽  
Till Schümmer ◽  
Ulrike Cress

Author(s):  
Vanesa Mirzaee ◽  
Maryam Najafian Razavi ◽  
Lee Iverson

This paper describes an innovative tagging model incorporated into a web 2.0 social and personal information management application. Our work utilizes web 2.0 tagging concepts in a new way in an effort to provide better support for users’ needs for contextualization and personalization of their information spaces for both personal…Cet article décrit un modèle innovateur d’étiquetage intégré à une application de gestion de l’information personnelle et sociale du Web 2.0. Notre travail utilise les concepts de l’étiquetage du Web 2.0 d’une manière nouvelle, afin de mieux subvenir aux besoins des utilisateurs pour la contextualisation et la personnalisation de leurs espaces informationnels, pour des fins personnelles… 


Author(s):  
Sebastian Marius Kirsch ◽  
Melanie Gnasa ◽  
Markus Won ◽  
Armin Cremers

Social information spaces are characterized by the presence of a social network between participants. This chapter presents methods for utilizing social networks for information retrieval, by applying graph authority measures to the social network. We show how to integrate authority measures in an information retrieval algorithm. In order to determine the suitability of the described algorithms, we examine the structure and statistical properties of social networks, and present examples of social networks as well as evaluation results.


Author(s):  
Sebastian Marius Kirsch ◽  
Melanie Gnasa ◽  
Armin B. Cremers

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana-Maria Vranceanu ◽  
Linda C. Gallo ◽  
Laura M. Bogart

The present study investigated whether a social information processing bias contributes to the inverse association between trait hostility and perceived social support. A sample of 104 undergraduates (50 men) completed a measure of hostility and rated videotaped interactions in which a speaker disclosed a problem while a listener reacted ambiguously. Results showed that hostile persons rated listeners as less friendly and socially supportive across six conversations, although the nature of the hostility effect varied by sex, target rated, and manner in which support was assessed. Hostility and target interactively impacted ratings of support and affiliation only for men. At least in part, a social information processing bias could contribute to hostile persons' perceptions of their social networks.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Kelley ◽  
Matthew B. Reysen ◽  
Kayla Ahlstrand ◽  
Carli Pentz

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan M. Kurss ◽  
Anna E. Craig ◽  
Jennifer Reiter-Purtill ◽  
Kathryn Vannatta ◽  
Cynthia Gerhardt

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document