Facial Fractures in the Pediatric Patient

Author(s):  
Jeffrey C. Posnick
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 551-559
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Waite

The author has reviewed the literature in the area of jaw and facial fractures in the pediatric patient. There are differences in incidence and treatment between the pediatric and adult patient. A review of the treatment principles for pediatric patient management is provided. Special attention is devoted to the use of "stock" trough splints in the treatment of mandibular fractures. The conservative treatment of condylar fractures is advocated.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranjit B Singh ◽  
Jeevan V Prakash ◽  
SN Chaitan ◽  
Prakash S Tandur ◽  
Shilpa Kokate

ABSTRACT Children are uniquely susceptible to craniofacial trauma because of their greater cranial mass-to-body ratio. The pediatric population sustains 1 to 14.7% of all facial fractures. The majority of these injuries are encountered by boys (53.7-80%) who are involved in motor vehicle accidents (up to 80.2%). The incidence of other systemic injury concomitant to facial trauma is significant (10.4-88%). The management of the pediatric patient with maxillofacial injury should take into consideration, the differences in anatomy and physiology between children and adults, the presence of concomitant injury, the particular stage in growth and development (anatomic, physiologic and psychological), and the specific injuries and anatomic sites that the injuries affect. The greatest concern when treating the pediatric patient is the effect of the injury or treatment on growth and development. This is both anatomically and psychologically important and may have various effects on management for the different stages of psychological development.


1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
D JOHNSON ◽  
V CONDON

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (3) ◽  
pp. S101-S102
Author(s):  
Julia Schuchard ◽  
Michael Kappelman ◽  
Andrew Grossman ◽  
Jennifer Clegg ◽  
Christopher Forrest

Author(s):  
N. Ulrich ◽  
M. Maier ◽  
N. Krayenbühl ◽  
S. Kollias ◽  
R. Bernays

2013 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Nithi Fernandes ◽  
Shahnawaz Amdani ◽  
Swati Sharma Dave
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (798) ◽  
pp. 138-139
Author(s):  
María Sierra Girón Prieto ◽  
Irene Ibáñez Godoy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-154
Author(s):  
M. Yu. Rykov ◽  
I. N. Inozemtsev ◽  
S. A. Kolomenskaya

Background.Analysis of medical care delivery for children with cancer in armed conflict is highly important because the high-tech treatment in this context is extraordinary difficult and challenging task. Objective. Our aim was to analyze the morbidity and mortality rates in children with malignant tumors, to assess the pediatric patient capacity and medical service density in the Donetsk People’s Republic.Methods.The ecological study was conducted where the units of analysis were represented by the aggregated data of the Republican Cancer Registry on the number of primary and secondary patients with malignant and benign tumors, the deceased patients in the DNR in 2014–2017, pediatric patient capacity, and medical service density.Results.The number of pediatric patient capacity for children with cancer was 10 (0.27 per 10,000 children aged 0–17), pediatric patient capacity for children with hematological disorders — 40 (1.37 per 10,000 children aged 0–17). The treatment of children with cancer was performed by 5 healthcare providers: 1 pediatric oncologist (0.02 per 10,000 children aged 0–17), 3 hematologists (0.08 per 10,000 pediatric population aged 0–17), and 1 practitioner who did not have a specialist certificate in oncology. Morbidity rate for malignant neoplasms from 2014 to 2017 decreased by 25% (in 2014 — 9.6 per 10,000 children aged 0–17; in 2017 — 7.2). In the morbidity structure, the incidence proportion of hemoblastoses was 68.4%, brain tumors — 2.6%, other solid tumors — 29%. The death rate due to malignant neoplasms decreased by 37% (in 2014 — 2.7; in 2017 — 1.7).Conclusion.Low levels of the incidence rate and pattern of morbidity indicate defects in the identification and recording of patients. This explains the performance of the bed: low average bed occupancy per year and low turnover. For a reliable analysis of mortality statistical data is not available: in 2014–2015 only the number of in-hospital deceased patients is presented. Limited data is due to the lack of reliable patient catamnesis which is explained by the high rate of population migration. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document