Follow-Up Care and Surgery for Recurrent Gastric Cancer

1989 ◽  
pp. 98-104
Author(s):  
P. Schlag ◽  
K. Buhl ◽  
C. Herfarth
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15615-e15615
Author(s):  
U. Toh ◽  
H. Yamana ◽  
K. Koufuji ◽  
T. Mine ◽  
K. Aoyagi ◽  
...  

e15615 Background: Taxanes and S-1 have been shown to be effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer and they have a considerable single-agent activity, respectively. We evaluated the combination of paclitaxel and S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: All patients with histologically confirmed AGC with unresectable or metastatic diseases, measurable lesions, PS 0–2, age between 18 and 75, and no contraindication to chemotherapy were eligible in this study. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy finished at least 6 months before enrollment was allowed. Treatment included S-1 80 mg/m2 p.o. twice daily on days 1–14 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, 8, 15 with a 2-week interval until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Results: Between MAY 2004 and Match 2008, total 20 pts were enrolled in this study. The median age was 56.5 years (range, 38–73). Nine pts had recurrent disease after previous curative gastrectomy and 8 had previous adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median 4 (range, 1–9) cycles of chemotherapy, 12 pts were evaluable for toxicity and 20 pts for response. In intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 62.9% (95% C.I., 36.2–69.6%), including 0 CR, 6 PRs, 8 SDs, and 6 PDs. After a median follow-up of 8.6 months (range, 0.9–17.9), median time to progression was 6.3 months (95% C.I., 3.6–6.9) and median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% C.I., 8.5–20.7). Commonly observed grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (40% of patients), anemia (10%). There was no neutropenic fever or treatment-related death. Conclusions: The combination of paclitaxel and S-1 appear to have well efficacy, manageable toxicity and is well tolerated in patients with AGC. Further studies of this combination should be considered. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Taki ◽  
Y Hoya ◽  
A Watanabe ◽  
T Nakayoshi ◽  
T Okamoto ◽  
...  

Introduction Radiotherapy is not commonly used for the treatment of gastric cancer in Japan, where surgery is the standard local treatment. We report the results of chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer which was deemed difficult to treat surgically. Methods Twenty-one patients with gastric cancer (including sixteen with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer and five with poor general condition) underwent chemo-radiotherapy, for whom the therapeutic efficacy, toxicity and survival period were analysed. Results The tumour response to chemoradiotherapy was categorised as complete, partial, stable or progressive in 5, 9, 3, and 4 patients, respectively, with an overall response rate of 67%. No serious complications such as gastrointestinal perforation or bleeding occurred, and no cardiac, hepatic or renal dysfunction developed during the follow-up period. The mean survival time was 19.8 months (range, 3–51 months). One patient died of another disease, 18 died of primary cancer and the cause of death was unknown in 2 patients. Conclusions Chemoradiotherapy appears to be an effective treatment for localised gastric cancer without distant metastases, but further studies are needed to determine the indications for chemoradiotherapy and late adverse effects, as well as the chemotherapy regimens to be used.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e049742
Author(s):  
Hui-qin Li ◽  
Jin-hua Han ◽  
Hua Yuan ◽  
Guang-ying Wan ◽  
Hui Xue ◽  
...  

IntroductionFollow-up care is important for gastric cancer survivors, but follow-up strategies for gastric cancer survivors remain inconsistent, and compliance of gastric cancer survivors with follow-up care is very low. Understanding the needs and preferences of gastric cancer survivors is conducive to developing appropriate and acceptable follow-up strategies, thereby improving patient compliance. Discrete choice experiments can quantify individual needs and preferences. However, to date, there is no discrete choice experiment on the preferences of gastric cancer survivors, and no studies have examined how gastric cancer survivors make choices based on different characteristics of follow-up. This paper outlines an ongoing discrete choice experiment that aims to (1) explore follow-up service-related characteristics that may affect gastric cancer survivors’ choices about their follow-up, (2) elicit how gastric cancer survivors consider the trade-offs among different follow-up service options using discrete choice experiment, (3) determine whether gastric cancer survivors’ needs and preferences for follow-up vary due to the economy, politics, technology and culture in different regions.Methods and analysisSix attributes were developed through a literature review, semistructured interviews and experts and focus group discussions. A fractional factorial design was used to evaluate the interaction between attributes. A multiple logit model will be used to understand the trade-off between the follow-up characteristics of gastric cancer survivors. A mixed logit model will be used to explore the willingness to pay and uptake rate of gastric cancer survivors for follow-up attributes and further explore the preferences of different groups.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the ethics committee of the School of Nursing, Jilin University. The results of this study will be shared through online blogs, policy briefs, seminars and peer-reviewed journal articles and will be used to modify the current strategy of gastric cancer survivors’ follow-up services according to economic development and regional culture.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-qin Li ◽  
Hua Yuan ◽  
Guang-ying Wan ◽  
Hui Xue ◽  
Xiu-ying Zhang

Abstract Purposes: The purposes of this discrete choice experiment are as follows:1.To investigate the preference of gastric cancer survivors for follow-up care.2.To quantify the importance of follow-up care-related characteristics that may affect the gastric cancer survivors’ choices of their follow-up, so as to provide references for development of the follow-up strategy of gastric cancer survivors.Methods: Discrete choice experimental design principles was applied to develop the survey instrument. All questionnaires were filled out by the respondents and collected on site. A mixed logit model was used to estimate gastric cancer survivors’ preferences. Willingness to pay estimates and simulations of follow-up uptake rates were calculated.Results: All six attributes are significant important for the follow-up care of gastric cancer survivors (p<0.05). Achieving very thorough follow-up contents was the most valued attribute level (coefficient=1.995). Specialist doctors are the most preferred providers, followed by specialist nurses and gastric cancer survivors were willing to pay more for these attribute levels. Changes in attribute levels affected uptake rate of follow-up. When the multiple attribute levels were changed at the same time, a very thorough follow-up contents provided by the same specialist doctor (specialist nurse), the probability of receiving follow-up increases by 95.82% (94.90%).Conclusions: The characteristics of follow-up care in our study reflect the health management services expectations of gastric cancer survivors. A dedicated specialist nurse involved in follow-up care should be developed to contributes to solve the complex and multifaceted personal needs of gastric cancer survivors.


2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
BRUCE K. DIXON
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
S Wojcinski ◽  
A Farrokh ◽  
U Hille ◽  
E Hirschauer ◽  
W Schmidt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document