Duplex Sonography of the Lower Extremity Venous System

1988 ◽  
pp. 239-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Maureen White
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Taylor ◽  
Caitlin W. Hicks ◽  
Jennifer A. Heller

1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
M M Baldt ◽  
K Böhler ◽  
T Zontsich ◽  
A A Bankier ◽  
M Breitenseher ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 152 (4) ◽  
pp. 765-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
HR Parvey ◽  
RL Eisenberg ◽  
V Giyanani ◽  
CA Krebs

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Kachlik ◽  
V Pechacek ◽  
V Baca ◽  
V Musil

The phlebology in the area of lower limbs is the only medical field in which the terminological needs of clinicians were met. Ten years ago, the latest revision of the Latin anatomical nomenclature, Terminologia Anatomica (TA), was issued. But almost none of the chapters reflected the clinicians' need to be a relevant theoretical base for correct diagnostics and appropriate treatment. In 2001, during the 14th World Congress of the International Union of Phlebology, a consensus document (under the auspices of Federative International Committee on Anatomical Terminology and International Federation of Associations of Anatomists) was laid to expand the nomenclature of the lower extremity venous system. Some terms have been changed and several new have been added, corresponding to their clinical significance and anatomical positions. Sixteen new terms have been added in both Latin and English languages in the chapter concerning the superficial veins of the lower limb. This consensus document will be incorporated into the next version of the TA. The international anatomical nomenclature serves as a communication base for research, diagnostic, therapy and information exchange in phlebological sciences.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 163-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
C W K P Arnoldussen ◽  
I Toonder ◽  
C H A Wittens

Objectives: To present a novel scoring system for lower-extremity venous pathology (the LOVE score) and our experiences using it in our clinical practice to identify venous pathology with duplex ultrasound (DUS) and magnetic resonance venography (MRV). Method: A total of 40 patients, 30 suspected of chronic venous disease and 10 with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were examined from the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the popliteal vein using DUS and MRV. The image findings were reported using the LOVE score. Results The majority of deep veins (368 out of 378 segments) were completely visualized by both our imaging techniques and could be analysed using the LOVE score. Both imaging techniques reported comparable findings with regard to the visualization of thrombus, obstruction, collaterals, trabeculations, anatomic variations and central venous compression (e.g. May–Thurner). Conclusions: The LOVE score can be used to expand and standardize the documentation of imaging the deep venous system beyond thrombosis, to help identify (optimal) treatment options in patients with venous disease, in both the clinical and research setting. This first assessment shows that both DUS and MRV are capable of systematically identifying a multitude of changes in the venous system.


1990 ◽  
Vol 155 (5) ◽  
pp. 1085-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
J F Polak ◽  
M I Karmel ◽  
J A Mannick ◽  
D H O'Leary ◽  
M C Donaldson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document