Sensory Deprivation and Sensory Isolation Research, and Political Torture: A 35-Year Critical Retrospective

Author(s):  
Jay Talmadge Shurley
1964 ◽  
Vol 110 (465) ◽  
pp. 290-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathryn Walters ◽  
Oscar A. Parsons ◽  
Jay T. Shurley

Since the pioneering studies of Hebb and his associates (2) on the effects of sensory deprivation on human beings, numerous investigators have conducted experimental studies under varying conditions in an effort to establish consistent trends in behaviour of subjects exposed to such conditions. Since only two other laboratories, both using male subjects, have reported underwater studies in deprivation (1, 5), an attempt to replicate our findings of sex differences in response to the situation by use of this method seemed to be in order.


1982 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind M. Ridley ◽  
Harry F. Baker

SynopsisStereotyped movements are described in monkeys and humans and are classified as arising from constraint, sensory deprivation in infancy, amphetamine treatment or psychotic states. It is argued that, with the exception of cage stereotypies, stereotyped behaviour is evidence of abnormality in the nervous system consequent upon distorted maturational processes, organic defect or biochemical disturbance. Stereotypy is associated with a state of cognitive inflexibility and social and sensory isolation in humans and monkeys. It is suggested that, while no simple biochemical disturbance in the brain can describe these various occurrences of stereotypy, the cross-species occurrence of a syndrome of isolation, cognitive inflexibility and stereotypy implies a related mechanism mediating these divergent effects. If stereotypy is regarded as a consequence of failure to use sensory input to direct behaviour, therapeutic regimes designed to stimulate responsive behaviours and social interactions are more likely to be effective in the long run than direct attempts to suppress stereotypy.


1968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Pishkin ◽  
Elizabeth A. Rasmussen ◽  
Carla R. Duke

1968 ◽  
Vol 73 (3, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 183-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Zuckerman ◽  
Harold Persky ◽  
Katherine E. Link ◽  
Gopak K. Basu

1960 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanford J. Freedman ◽  
Richard Held
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1558-1573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ting Mao ◽  
Tian-Miao Hua ◽  
Sarah L. Pallas

Sensory neocortex is capable of considerable plasticity after sensory deprivation or damage to input pathways, especially early in development. Although plasticity can often be restorative, sometimes novel, ectopic inputs invade the affected cortical area. Invading inputs from other sensory modalities may compromise the original function or even take over, imposing a new function and preventing recovery. Using ferrets whose retinal axons were rerouted into auditory thalamus at birth, we were able to examine the effect of varying the degree of ectopic, cross-modal input on reorganization of developing auditory cortex. In particular, we assayed whether the invading visual inputs and the existing auditory inputs competed for or shared postsynaptic targets and whether the convergence of input modalities would induce multisensory processing. We demonstrate that although the cross-modal inputs create new visual neurons in auditory cortex, some auditory processing remains. The degree of damage to auditory input to the medial geniculate nucleus was directly related to the proportion of visual neurons in auditory cortex, suggesting that the visual and residual auditory inputs compete for cortical territory. Visual neurons were not segregated from auditory neurons but shared target space even on individual target cells, substantially increasing the proportion of multisensory neurons. Thus spatial convergence of visual and auditory input modalities may be sufficient to expand multisensory representations. Together these findings argue that early, patterned visual activity does not drive segregation of visual and auditory afferents and suggest that auditory function might be compromised by converging visual inputs. These results indicate possible ways in which multisensory cortical areas may form during development and evolution. They also suggest that rehabilitative strategies designed to promote recovery of function after sensory deprivation or damage need to take into account that sensory cortex may become substantially more multisensory after alteration of its input during development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document