Multiple Receiver, Zero-Length Baseline Kinematic GPS Positioning Techniques for Airborne Gravity Measurement

1992 ◽  
pp. 251-260
Author(s):  
M. F. Peters ◽  
J. M. Brozena ◽  
G. L. Mader
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Measurement ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Gps Positioning ◽  
Kinematic Gps ◽  
Multiple Receiver

scholarly journals Medium to Long Range Kinematic GPS Positioning with Position-Velocity-Acceleration Model Using Multiple Reference Stations

Sensors ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 16895-16909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Ki Hong ◽  
Chi Park ◽  
Joong-hee Han ◽  
Jay Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Long Range ◽  
Gps Positioning ◽  
Kinematic Gps ◽  
Acceleration Model ◽  
Multiple Reference

Algorithms and results of kinematic gps positioning

CISM journal ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-575
Author(s):  
Yola Georgiadou ◽  
Alfred Kleusberg
Keyword(s):  
Gps Positioning ◽  
Kinematic Gps

New concepts for airborne gravity measurement

2001 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 413-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fethi Abdelmoula
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Measurement ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
New Concepts

Precise kinematic GPS positioning

1989 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Landau
Keyword(s):  
Gps Positioning ◽  
Kinematic Gps

Reply by the author to N. C. Steenland

Geophysics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-311
Author(s):  
Sigmund Hammer
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Data Processing ◽  
Gravity Anomalies ◽  
Probable Error ◽  
Resolving Power ◽  
Gravity Measurement ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Implicit Assumption ◽  
Grid System ◽  
Gravity Method

Dr. Steenland’s principal criticism arises from an unfortunate overstatement, in my paper, of the precision and anomaly resolving power of the Carson Airborne Gravity method. This criticism is well deserved. My calculation of the probable error of an airborne gravity measurement was based on many thousands of Δg gravity differences at grid‐line intersections, but it made the implicit assumption that the two reported gravity values at each grid intersection were independent. This is incorrect because the grid system of intersection differences is used for controls in the data processing. A realistic value for the probable error of an airborne gravity measurement is of the order of 1 mgal (standard deviation of 1.5 mgal). The associated resolving power for gravity anomalies, above this magnitude, is of the order of 2 to 3 miles (3 to 5 km) at flight speed of 50 knots. Smaller anomalies may be resolved at lower speeds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document