Free Will and Nonlocality at Detection as Basic Principles of Quantum Physics

Author(s):  
Antoine Suarez
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (10) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Андрей Габов ◽  
Andrey Gabov ◽  
Ольга Беляева ◽  
Olga Byelyayeva

Authors of article analyze algorithm of actions of the arbitration court in a situation when the respondent declares that didn´t sign the contract which contains the arbitration clause. Authors formulate the conclusions on the basis of research of the basic principles of arbitration trial, and also lawsuits. Authors note that the main beginning of arbitration trial is free will of its parties, consider types of the arbitration agreements practiced in the Russian Federation, explain value of the principle of competence – competence and autonomy of the arbitration clause in activity of the arbitration court. In article the algorithm of actions of the arbitration court at purpose of handwriting examination is stated, and also by its results, importance of check of a being of dispute regarding possibility of its permission in the arbitration court is noted.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-125
Author(s):  
Lukáš Ryšavý

Summary The party autonomy, known as one of the basic principles in private law, is one of the fundamental pillars of arbitration and one of the fundamental differences between the arbitration procedure and the proceeding before the ordinary courts. Although a wide degree of party autonomy is provided to the parties in arbitration, this “freedom” is not boundless and is limited by a number of different limitations. This article point out limitations and diversity of national regulations in the matter of appointment of arbitrator.


Author(s):  
Ignacio Cirac ◽  
Adolfo Plasencia

In this dialogue, the physicist Ignacio Cirac, director of the Theoretical Division of the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics, outlines why quantum physics has brought about a much greater change than that caused by Einstein’s theory of relativity, how quantum physics takes free will into account and how it combines with philosophy. He describes why quantum theory defines “everything else,” yet is unable to define itself. Explaining how, together with Peter Zoller, he developed and presented the first theoretical description of a quantum computing architecture based on trapped ions, and, how this quantum architecture will be viable and capable of performing calculations we cannot perform at present. Their quantum computer calculates in qubits, which would require at least 100,000 qubits to function, rising to 1,000,000 if error correction is implemented. It will be able to perform calculations previously unachievable and create encrypted messages impossible to decipher. Building a functional quantum computer still requires a huge technological change, which has yet to come about. Lastly, Cirac explains the differences between European and American visions of science and why mathematicians are even more conservative than physicists.


1989 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron Morstyn

Most psychodynamic theories are based on Freud's models of mental dynamics which were significantly influenced by Newtonian physics. Freud's attempts to use the then current scientific metaphors led to theoretical and clinical dilemmas particularly in deep psychotherapy and especially with borderline patients. The author argues that as Newtonian principles are useful for describing macroscopic reality, so Freud's Newtonian constructs are useful to a certain depth of therapy. Beyond that point, scientific metaphors can be retained but the appropriate metaphors are those of quantum physics. Quantum metaphors are used to explore duality, free will and patient-therapist interaction.


Religions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 832
Author(s):  
David Torrijos-Castrillejo

The results from contemporary science, especially the theory of evolution and quantum physics, seem to favor process theology. Moreover, the evil committed by free will leads some theologians to reduce divine action in order to prevent God from being responsible for evil. Thus, among those who defend a particular providence, Molinism finds many followers. This article first argues that contemporary science does not constrain us to deny particular providence. Second, it criticizes the implicitly deterministic character of Molinism. Thirdly, a Thomistic solution is proposed as an alternative which, by means of a different metaphysical approach to cosmic contingency and freedom of will, defends particular providence without reducing divine activity except in personal sins.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-81
Author(s):  
James Lefeu ◽  

This essay explores quantum physics and theology to propose that ontological randomness does not exist, but divine Providence does. Some interpretations of quantum physics that involve mathematical formalism and observational phenomenology are deterministic (de Broglie-Bohm, many-worlds, cosmological, time-symmetric, many-minds), while others are non-deterministic (Copenhagen, stochastic, objective collapse, transactional). Yet, quantum events are merely epistemically indeterminable by us, but actually do have a fundamental cause. Compatibilism best describes the teaching of the Bible. Humans possess free agency, and are determined by their desires and values. Hence, they can be said to have “free will,” because they do what they want. The fundamental cause, as understood by Compatibilism, is God’s Providence, defined as God’s continual involvement with creation through keeping it existing, cooperating with creation in every action, and directing it to fulfill His purposes. The interaction between quantum physics and Providence suggests methodological parallels between science and theology in a quest for synthesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document