quantum universe
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

101
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Ambjørn ◽  
Z. Drogosz ◽  
J. Gizbert-Studnicki ◽  
A. Görlich ◽  
J. Jurkiewicz ◽  
...  

AbstractUsing computer simulations, we study the geometry of a typical quantum universe, i.e., the geometry one might expect before a possible period of inflation. We display it using coordinates defined by means of four classical scalar fields satisfying the Laplace equation with nontrivial boundary conditions. They are a close analogue of the harmonic coordinate condition used in the context of GR (Kuchar and Torre in Phys Rev D 43:419–441, 1991). It is highly nontrivial that these ideas can be applied to understand the structures which appear in very irregular and fluctuating geometries. The field configurations reveal cosmic web structures surprisingly similar to the ones observed in the present-day universe.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 316-324
Author(s):  
Fritz W. Bopp

Starting with unitary quantum dynamics, we investigate how to add quantum measurements. Quantum measurements have four essential components: the furcation, the witness production, an alignment projection, and the actual choice decision. The first two components still lie in the domain of unitary quantum dynamics. The decoherence concept explains the third contribution. It can be based on the requirement that witnesses reaching the end of time on the wave function side and the conjugate one have to be identical. In this way, it also stays within the quantum dynamics domain. The surjection hypothesis explains the actual choice decision. It is based on a two boundary interpretation applied to the complete quantum universe. It offers a simple way to reduce these seemingly random projections to purely deterministic unitary quantum dynamics, eliminating the measurement problem.


Author(s):  
Fritz W. Bopp

Starting with unitary quantum dynamics, we investigate how to add quantum measurements. Quantum measurements have four essential components: the furcation, the witness production, an alignment projection, and the actual choice decision. The first two components still lie in the domain of unitary quantum dynamics. The decoherence concept explains the third contribution. It can be based on the requirement that witnesses reaching the end of time on the wave function side and the conjugate one have to be identical. In this way, it also stays within the quantum dynamics domain. The surjection hypothesis explains the actual choice decision. It is based on a two boundary interpretation applied to the complete quantum universe. It offers a simple way to reduce these seemingly random projections to purely deterministic unitary quantum dynamics, eliminating the measurement problem.


Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 337
Author(s):  
Alexey V. Melkikh

If the isolated system of bosons and fermions was initially in a pure maximally entangled quantum state, then, as a result of decoherence caused by the creation and annihilation of particles, this system not only enters a mixed state but also achieves equilibrium. The time of such a transition does not depend on the size of the system but is determined only by the properties of the particles. This phenomenon allows the problem of the horizon (the homogeneity of the universe) to be solved, since the transition time of different parts of the universe (if they were originally entangled with each other) to equilibrium will not depend on their sizes, and the speed of the interaction may be greater than the speed of light. Based on the decay of entangled states, the problem of the predominance of matter over antimatter in the universe can also be solved.


2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz W. Bopp

AbstractAn intricate quantum statistical effect guides us to a deterministic, non-causal quantum universe with a given fixed initial and final state density matrix. A concept is developed on how and where something like macroscopic physics can emerge. However, the concept does not allow philosophically crucial free will decisions. The quantum world and its conjugate evolve independently, and one can replace fixed final states on each side just with a common matching one. This change allows for external manipulations done in the quantum world and its conjugate, which do not otherwise alter the basic quantum dynamics. In a big bang/big crunch universe, the expanding part can be attributed to the quantum world and the contracting one to the conjugate one. The obtained bi-linear picture has several noteworthy consequences.


10.1142/11716 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B Hartle
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Vladimir I. Arshinov ◽  
◽  
Vladimir G. Budanov ◽  

The article is devoted to the discussion of some characteristic features of the “complexity paradigm” (Moraine). It is emphasized that thinking in complexity needs an adequate conceptual optics, methodological support, which can be rep­resented by a conceptual assemblage – a heterogeneous perceptual and com­municative network of concepts of quantum mechanics and Peirce semiotics, considered ontogenetically in terms of processality, temporality, becoming. The situation with thinking in complexity is such that this optics should arise as a certain set of cognitive operations as a certain topologically connected set of semiotically meaningful operations in the very process of realizing a cognitive situation as becoming specifically complex. And this awareness is a key prereq­uisite for the emergence of that epistemological situation, which we call “meet­ing with complexity”. Or, more precisely, thinking together with complexity. It is emphasized that the encounter with complexity itself implies the presence of a kind of sensitivity, an intuitive predisposition to its conscious recognition as such. We need such a conceptual character as the “observer of complexity”, un­derstood in the unity of the multiplicity of cybersemiotic, synergetic and quan­tum mechanical perspectives. A character who traces his ancestry from the quan­tum-relativistic physics of the twentieth century and the procedural philosophy of Pierce, Bergson and Whitehead.It is emphasized that in Peirce's scheme there is a specific, context-dependent relationship between signs and objects with which they are connected through the third element, an interpreter that plays the role of a connecting link between them" And this semiotic interpreter of Peirce is, in fact, a semiotic observer-a participant in the becoming turbulent flow of temporal complexity, synergistically included in the self-organizing quantum Universe.


Universe ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Houri Ziaeepour

So far, none of attempts to quantize gravity has led to a satisfactory model that not only describe gravity in the realm of a quantum world, but also its relation to elementary particles and other fundamental forces. Here, we outline the preliminary results for a model of quantum universe, in which gravity is fundamentally and by construction quantic. The model is based on three well motivated assumptions with compelling observational and theoretical evidence: quantum mechanics is valid at all scales; quantum systems are described by their symmetries; universe has infinite independent degrees of freedom. The last assumption means that the Hilbert space of the Universe has SU(N→∞)≅areapreservingDiff.(S2) symmetry, which is parameterized by two angular variables. We show that, in the absence of a background spacetime, this Universe is trivial and static. Nonetheless, quantum fluctuations break the symmetry and divide the Universe to subsystems. When a subsystem is singled out as reference—observer—and another as clock, two more continuous parameters arise, which can be interpreted as distance and time. We identify the classical spacetime with parameter space of the Hilbert space of the Universe. Therefore, its quantization is meaningless. In this view, the Einstein equation presents the projection of quantum dynamics in the Hilbert space into its parameter space. Finite dimensional symmetries of elementary particles emerge as a consequence of symmetry breaking when the Universe is divided to subsystems/particles, without having any implication for the infinite dimensional symmetry and its associated interaction-percived as gravity. This explains why gravity is a universal force.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document