Reducing Recidivism Through Correctional Programming: Using Meta-Analysis to Inform the RNR Simulation Tool

2013 ◽  
pp. 167-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Caudy ◽  
Liansheng Tang ◽  
Stephanie A. Ainsworth ◽  
Jennifer Lerch ◽  
Faye S. Taxman
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Simulation Tool ◽  
Correctional Programming ◽  
Reducing Recidivism

Does the good lives model work? A systematic review of the recidivism evidence

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-300
Author(s):  
Jenna Zeccola ◽  
Sally Fiona Kelty ◽  
Douglas Boer
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Correct Treatment ◽  
Recidivism Rates ◽  
Good Lives Model ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Reducing Recidivism ◽  
Prison Community ◽  
Treatment Dosage ◽  
Good Lives

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the efficacy of good lives model (GLM) interventions on the recidivism outcomes of convicted offenders. Design/methodology/approach The review adhered to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis and Cochrane guidelines. Digital databases were searched and articles reporting outcomes of the GLM amongst convicted offenders and outcomes including recidivism data and pre-post measures of dynamic risk were included in a narrative synthesis. Findings Of 1,791 articles screened, only six studies met the criteria for review. Key findings were: in half the reviewed studies, GLM did not increase recidivism risk; in half the reviewed studies, only when the correct treatment dosage was applied that some evidence of risk reduction was found; there was limited support for GLM increasing or sustaining motivation for resistance from reoffending. Research for the review was limited and support for the GLM in reducing recidivism rates was not established. Practical implications In this 2021 review, the authors examined the efficacy of the GLM in reducing recidivism. This addresses a gap in the literature. The authors found that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that the GLM can reduce recidivism. This has implications for practitioners who wish to deliver evidence-based practices in prison/community settings. There is currently not enough peer-reviewed evidence to unequivocally confirm the efficacy of the GLM. The authors recommended additional quality programme outcome research be carried out. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to assess quantitative and qualitative studies on the efficacy of the GLM and provides foundations for future research.

scholarly journals A Rapid Evidence Assessment of the effectiveness of prison education in reducing recidivism and increasing employment

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Ellison ◽  
Kirstine Szifris ◽  
Rachel Horan ◽  
Chris Fox
Keyword(s):  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prison Education ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Educational Provision ◽  
Educational Programmes ◽  
Cent Increase ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Reducing Recidivism

This is a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) of educational programmes delivered within prison. Included in this review are evaluations of vocational, academic, basic skills, accredited and unaccredited educational provision in prison where recidivism and/or employment were measured as outcomes. Initial searches returned 4304 titles and abstracts. Of these, 28 papers met the criteria for inclusion. Only 18 papers provided sufficient information and robust enough research design to be included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis on 18 reoffending studies identified that delivering education in prison settings has a positive impact on recidivism. Overall, the pooled odds ratio indicates a reduction in the likelihood of recidivating of approximately one-third (0.64 = 64%∼2/3). Meta-analysis on five employment studies identified that education in prison settings has a positive impact on employment. Overall, odds ratios indicated a 24 per cent increase in likelihood of gaining employment if the prisoner engages in prison education. However, this is based on a small number of papers with statistical findings being less robust and evidence drawn largely from the USA.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Mental Health Courts in Reducing Recidivism: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan M. Lowder ◽  
Candalyn B. Rade ◽  
Sarah L. Desmarais
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mental Health Courts ◽  
Reducing Recidivism

scholarly journals Reentry Programs for Adult Male Offender Recidivism and Reintegration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (14) ◽  
pp. 4655-4676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Berghuis
Keyword(s):  
Adult Male ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Theory Development ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Reentry Programs ◽  
Male Offenders ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Reducing Recidivism ◽  
Adult Male Offenders

The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of reentry programs designed to reduce recidivism and ensure successful reintegration among adult, male offenders. Studies were included if they (a) evaluated a reentry program incorporating elements dealing with the transition from prison to community for adult, male offenders; (b) utilized a randomized controlled design; and (c) measured recidivism as a primary outcome. In addition, secondary outcomes measures of reintegration were also included. The systematic search of 8,179 titles revealed nine randomized controlled evaluations that fulfilled eligibility criteria. The random-effects meta-analysis for rearrest revealed a statistically nonsignificant effect favoring the intervention (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.74, 1.07]). Similar results were found for reconviction (OR = 0.94, 95% CI [0.77, 1.12]) and reincarceration (OR = 0.90, 95% CI [0.78, 1.05]). Studies reported mixed results of secondary outcomes of reintegration. The results of this review reflect the variability of findings on reducing recidivism. The challenges faced in conducting this review highlight a need for further research and theory development around reentry programs.

A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effectiveness of Corrections-Based Treatments for Drug Abuse

1999 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANK S. PEARSON ◽  
DOUGLAS S. LIPTON
Keyword(s):  
Drug Abuse ◽  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Methadone Maintenance ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Evaluation Research ◽  
Drug Abusers ◽  
Analytic Review ◽  
Reducing Recidivism ◽  
Abuse Treatment

The Correctional Drug Abuse Treatment Effectiveness project obtained and coded evaluation research studies (unpublished as well as published) of treatment/intervention programs reported from 1968 to 1996. Meta-analysis was used to examine evidence for their effectiveness in reducing recidivism for incarcerated offenders who are drug abusers. Results supported the effectiveness of therapeutic community programs but not of boot camps and drug-focused group counseling. Evaluations of other interventions were based on too few studies to draw strong conclusions, but promising treatments that warrant further attention include use of methadone maintenance treatment, substance abuse education, 12-step programs, and cognitive behavioral therapy for offender populations.

The Effectiveness of Protection Orders in Reducing Recidivism in Domestic Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
pp. 152483801988236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinie Cordier ◽  
Donna Chung ◽  
Sarah Wilkes-Gillan ◽  
Renée Speyer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Protection Orders ◽  
Legal Response ◽  
Police Reports ◽  
Reducing Recidivism ◽  
Meta Analyses

Preventing and reducing domestic violence is a national and international social priority. Civil law protection orders (POs) have been the primary legal response to domestic violence internationally for a number of decades. However, evidence of their effectiveness is mixed due to variations in application within and across countries and variable quality of the research with most studies at high risk of bias. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of POs in reducing violation rates of domestic violence, compare violation rates reported by victims and police reports, and identify factors that influence violation and reoffense. Two electronic databases were searched; two independent researchers screened abstracts. Data were collected and assessed methodologically, using the Kmet Checklist Appraisal Tool and National Health and Medical Research Council Hierarchy of Evidence. Twenty-five studies that evaluated the effectiveness of POs in reducing recidivism in domestic violence met the eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses of weighted means of violation in the studies were conducted. Violation rates were found to be higher for victim reports compared with police reports. Violation rates were reduced when POs used in combination with arrests. PO violation rates were lower among perpetrators without histories of arrest for committing violence, perpetrators not engaging in stalking, and where couples have had medium to high incomes. There is no consensus among the studies about what the most appropriate methodology is to measure PO effectiveness. Future research should establish a more unified approach to evaluating the effectiveness and violations of POs.

Halfway Out: An Examination of the Effects of Halfway Houses on Criminal Recidivism

2018 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 1018-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Wong ◽  
Jessica Bouchard ◽  
Kelsey Gushue ◽  
Chelsey Lee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Community Supervision ◽  
Criminal Recidivism ◽  
Correctional Programming ◽  
Halfway Houses ◽  
Log Odds

Halfway houses are a form of community supervision and correctional programming that have become a staple intervention in recent years. Despite the ingrained belief in their benefits with respect to successful reintegration, this assumption may not be justified based on the existing literature. The current study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies examining the effects of halfway houses on recidivism. Overall, the findings suggest that halfway houses are an effective correctional strategy for successful reentry (log odds ratio [LOR] = 0.236, z = 9.27, p < .001). Further work is needed to determine best practices for programming and meeting the needs of different participants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document