Standard Cost Model

2019 ◽  
pp. 1940-1944
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Weigel
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. 41-53
Author(s):  
Tamás Laposa

This paper presents a new approach to measure the effects of e-government concepts on the reduction of administrative burdens, in the domain of European fund management. The topic may receive considerable interest since the present European legislation specifies that Member States shall provide online portal services and offer paperless fund management possibilities for beneficiaries in order to reduce the administrative burdens of cohesion policy. This concept is marked with the term “eCohesion” in the scientific discourse. Based on former studies, the concept has several micro- and macro-level attributes that leverage its effectiveness and impact on burden reduction. Nevertheless the level of their influence has not been underpinned by evidence based research yet. Consequently this paper outlines a research design for the measurability and impact assessment of the above attributes. The development of the research design is based on the Standard Cost Model, the widely-used methodology for the measurement of administrative burdens. The present paper applies the model to the attributes of eCohesion by formulating research hypotheses in order to make them measurable and to assess their relevance. The design created paves the way for a further quantitative research and methodologically supports Member States in developing a deeper understanding of the nature of eCohesion.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Coletti

AbstractLearning from the successes and failures of others is a necessity in the field of public sector innovation. The rapid diffusion of policy innovations in different countries has been characterized by a schizophrenic adoption of practices with governments utilizing those considered the “best” as well as those deemed capable of actually providing solutions to policy problems. Nevertheless, the replication of policy innovations in different countries has been met with varying degrees of success. The adoption of the Standard Cost Model in a number of European countries, a methodology to measure red tape and improve the quality of regulation provides an excellent example of this due to it being met with success in some countries while failing inexplicably in others.


Author(s):  
Wolfgang Weigel
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Wolfgang Weigel
Keyword(s):  

elni Review ◽  
2008 ◽  
pp. 25-38
Author(s):  
Jochen Gebauer

Is environmental regulation more likely to result in additional “transaction costs” than other policy areas? Are the costs of environmental legislation perceived differently? Why are businesses apparently less prepared to accept administrative costs in the field of environmental legislation, whereas they readily accept relatively high administrative costs in other areas? This article provides a brief description of the idea and the basic principles of the Standard Cost Model, of the German SCM Measurement Process including the results from Germany and of the ongoing EU SCM Measurement Process. It also looks at the specific role of environmental legislation in the political context of Better Regulation and the possible impact that the recent political focus on SCM and administrative cost (as a part of regulatory cost) may have on new and existing environmental regulation and on the implementation of environmental policies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document