Quantized Bogolyubov Transformation and Microscopic Foundation of IBM

1982 ◽  
pp. 523-529
Author(s):  
Li-Ming Yang
Keyword(s):  
Bogolyubov Transformation

A generalized Bogolyubov transformation and neutron-proton pairing in nuclei

1965 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 663-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Camiz ◽  
A. Covello ◽  
M. Jean
Keyword(s):  
Bogolyubov Transformation ◽  
Proton Pairing

Bogolyubov transformation in a strong coupling theory. III

1972 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 731-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. P. Solodovnikova ◽  
A. N. Tavkhelidze ◽  
O. A. Khrustalev
Keyword(s):  
Strong Coupling ◽  
Coupling Theory ◽  
Bogolyubov Transformation ◽  
Strong Coupling Theory

Generalized Bogolyubov transformation

1990 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. L1113-L1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Hong-Yi ◽  
J VanderLinde
Keyword(s):  
Bogolyubov Transformation

scholarly journals Mathematical foundations of the translation-invariant bipolaron theory of superconductivity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Dmitrievich Lakhno
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature Superconductors ◽  
Bogolyubov Transformation ◽  
Strong Electron ◽  
Translation Invariant ◽  
Angle Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy ◽  
Electron Phonon Interaction ◽  
Mathematical Foundations ◽  
Senior Students ◽  
Theory Of Superconductivity

The monograph presents the theory of translation-invariant polarons and bipolarons based on the theory of squeezed vacuum wave functions. It is shown that the Tulub ansatz, which establishes a connection between the generalized Bogolyubov transformation with the unitary squeezed operator gives a solution to the spectral problem for a bipolaron. The solutions obtained are used to construct a theory of superconductivity based on the Froehlich Hamiltonian with a strong electron-phonon interaction. The role of Cooper pairs in it is played by TI bipolarons of spatially delocalized electrons with a small correlation length. The theory developed explains a large number of experiments on the thermodynamic, spectroscopic and transport characteristics of high-temperature superconductors, Josephson tunneling, angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, neutron scattering, etc. The book is intended for physicists and mathematicians who work in the field of the theory of condensed matter, as well as graduate students and senior students of universities.

Quantum fields in curved spacetime

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Kachelriess
Keyword(s):  
Event Horizon ◽  
Particle Production ◽  
Conformal Symmetry ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Unruh Effect ◽  
Quantum Fields ◽  
Curved Spacetime ◽  
Bogolyubov Transformation ◽  
Curved Space ◽  
Thermal Spectrum

After a review of conformal symmetry, this chapter covers the quantisation of fields in curved space-times. It is shown that field operators defined with respect to different vacua are related by a Bogolyubov transformation and that the mixing of positive and negative frequencies determines the amount of particle production. The Unruh effect is explained and it is shown that in a space-time with an event horizon, a thermal spectrum of particles is created close to the horizon.

Bogolyubov transformation in the Lee model

1983 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 451-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. G. Bornyakov ◽  
O. D. Timofeevskaya
Keyword(s):  
Bogolyubov Transformation ◽  
Lee Model

Bogolyubov transformation in the strong coupling theory. II

1972 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. P. Solodovnikova ◽  
A. N. Tavkhelidze ◽  
O. A. Khrustalev
Keyword(s):  
Strong Coupling ◽  
Coupling Theory ◽  
Bogolyubov Transformation ◽  
Strong Coupling Theory

scholarly journals Time-dependent particle production and particle number in cosmological de Sitter space

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 1550031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Greenwood
Keyword(s):  
Particle Production ◽  
Occupation Number ◽  
Operator Method ◽  
Large Mass ◽  
Invariant Operator ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
De Sitter ◽  
Power Law Distribution ◽  
Bogolyubov Transformation ◽  
Thermal Distribution

In this paper, we consider the occupation number of induced quasi-particles which are produced during a time-dependent process using three different methods: Instantaneous diagonalization, the usual Bogolyubov transformation between two different vacua (more precisely the instantaneous vacuum and the so-called adiabatic vacuum), and the Unruh–DeWitt detector methods. Here we consider the Hamiltonian for a time-dependent Harmonic oscillator, where both the mass and frequency are taken to be time-dependent. From the Hamiltonian we derive the occupation number of the induced quasi-particles using the invariant operator method. In deriving the occupation number we also point out and make the connection between the Functional Schrödinger formalism, quantum kinetic equation, and Bogolyubov transformation between two different Fock space basis at equal times and explain the role in which the invariant operator method plays. As a concrete example, we consider particle production in the flat FRW chart of de Sitter spacetime. Here we show that the different methods lead to different results: The instantaneous diagonalization method leads to a power law distribution, while the usual Bogolyubov transformation and Unruh–DeWitt detector methods both lead to thermal distributions (however the dimensionality of the results are not consistent with the dimensionality of the problem; the usual Bogolyubov transformation method implies that the dimensionality is 3D while the Unruh–DeWitt detector method implies that the dimensionality is 7D/2). It is shown that the source of the descrepency between the instantaneous diagonalization and usual Bogolyubov methods is the fact that there is no notion of well-defined particles in the out vacuum due to a divergent term. In the usual Bogolyubov method, this divergent term cancels leading to the thermal distribution, while in the instantaneous diagonalization method there is no such cancelation leading to the power law distribution. However, to obtain the thermal distribution in the usual Bogolyubov method, one must use the large mass limit. On physical grounds, one should expect that only the modes which have been allowed to sample the horizon would be thermal, thus in the large mass limit these modes are well within the horizon and, even though they do grow, they remain well within the horizon due to the mass. Thus, one should not expect a thermal distribution since the modes will not have a chance to thermalize.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document