Renormalization Group Results for Random Resistor Networks

Author(s):  
A. B. Harris
2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (18) ◽  
pp. 2293-2310
Author(s):  
M. MIRZAEE ◽  
M. A. JAFARIZADEH

Using the S3-symmetry of Sierpinski fractal resistor networks we determine the current distribution as well as the multifractals spectrum of moments of current distribution by using the real space renormalization group technique based on ([q/4]+1) independent Schure's invariant polynomials of inwards flowing currents.


1979 ◽  
Vol 129 (11) ◽  
pp. 407 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. Vladimirov ◽  
D.V. Shirkov

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 655-662
Author(s):  
O. Borisenko ◽  
◽  
V. Chelnokov ◽  
V. Kushnir ◽  
◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Benfatto ◽  
Giovanni Gallavotti

Author(s):  
Margaret Morrison

After reviewing some of the recent literature on non-causal and mathematical explanation, this chapter develops an argument as to why renormalization group (RG) methods should be seen as providing non-causal, yet physical, information about certain kinds of systems/phenomena. The argument centres on the structural character of RG explanations and the relationship between RG and probability theory. These features are crucial for the claim that the non-causal status of RG explanations involves something different from simply ignoring or “averaging over” microphysical details—the kind of explanations common to statistical mechanics. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the role of RG in treating dynamical systems and how that role exemplifies the structural aspects of RG explanations which in turn exemplifies the non-causal features.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document