Experimental Tests of General Relativity: Past, Present and Future

1980 ◽  
pp. 529-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. W. F. Everitt
1992 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
CLIFFORD M. WILL

The status of experimental tests of general relativity and of theoretical frameworks for analysing them are reviewed. Einstein’s equivalence principle is well supported by experiments such as the Eötvös experiment, tests of special relativity, and the gravitational redshift experiment. Tests of general relativity have reached high precision, including the light deflection, the Shapiro time delay, the perihelion advance of Mercury, and the Nordtvedt effect in lunar motion. Gravitational wave damping has been detected to half a percent using the binary pulsar, and new binary pulsar systems promise further improvements. The status of the “fifth force” is discussed, along with the frontiers of experimental relativity, including proposals for testing relativistic gravity with advanced technology and spacecraft.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 1460254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. Nobili

General relativity is founded on the experimental fact that in a gravitational field all bodies fall with the same acceleration regardless of their mass and composition. This is the weak equivalence principle, or universality of free fall. Experimental evidence of a violation would require either that general relativity is to be amended or that another force of nature is at play. In 1916 Einstein brought as evidence the torsion balance experiments by Eötvös, to 10-8–10-9. In the 1960s and early 70s, by exploiting the "passive" daily rotation of the Earth, torsion balance tests improved to 10-11 and 10-12. More recently, active rotation of the balance at higher frequencies has reached 10-13. No other experimental tests of general relativity are both so crucial for the theory and so precise and accurate. If a similar differential experiment is performed inside a spacecraft passively stabilized by 1 Hz rotation while orbiting the Earth at ≃ 600 km altitude the test would improve by 4 orders of magnitude, to 10-17, thus probing a totally unexplored field of physics. This is unique to weakly coupled concentric macroscopic test cylinders inside a rapidly rotating spacecraft.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (14) ◽  
pp. 1944021
Author(s):  
Sebastian Bahamonde ◽  
Mir Faizal

The Einstein equations, apart from being the classical field equations of General Relativity, are also the classical field equations of two other theories of gravity. As the experimental tests of General Relativity are done using the Einstein equations, we do not really know if gravity is the curvature of a torsionless spacetime or torsion of a curvatureless spacetime or if it occurs due to the nonmetricity of a curvatureless and torsionless spacetime. However, as the classical actions of all these theories differ from each other by the boundary terms, and the Casimir effect is a boundary effect, we propose that a novel gravitational Casimir effect between superconductors can be used to test which of these theories actually describe gravity.


1986 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 355-367
Author(s):  
Clifford M. Will

We review the status of experimental tests of general relativity. These include tests of the Einstein Equivalence Principle, which requires that gravitation be described by a curved-spacetime, “metric” theory of gravity. General relativity is consistent with all tests to date, including the “classical tests”: light deflection using radio interferometers, radar time delay using Viking Mars landers, and the perihelion shift of Mercury; and tests of the strong equivalence principle, such as lunar laser ranging tests of the “Nordtvedt effect”, and tests for variations in G. We also review ten years of observations of the Binary Pulsar, in which the first evidence for gravitational radiation has been found.


The principal cornerstone of all scientific theory is experimental evidence, yet in the case of General Relativity Theory, for almost fifty years, such evidence has been largely lacking. The early experiments th at were said to verify Einstein’s theory, while technological triumphs of their day, must be viewed by today’s standards as only weak or qualitative confirmations, beset as many of them were by large statistical and systematic errors. On the one hand this situation is surprising, in view of the major impact that General Relativity has had on our view of space and time and of the creation and fate of the universe. On the other hand it is not so surprising, in view of the extreme weakness of the gravitational interaction and the consequent difficulty of most experiments. However, the astronomical and technological revolution of the 1960s and 1970s has altered this situation. Advances in atomic clocks, radar and laser ranging to planets and spacecraft, radio interferometry, low-noise motion sensors such as gravimeters, to name a few, have made the high-precision testing of gravitation theory almost routine. In this paper we summarize the present experimental evidence for General Relativity and describe new arenas for future tests of gravitational theory. For a more detailed review see Will (1979).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document