Surgical Resection of Hepatic Tumors-Patient Selection and Technical Considerations

Author(s):  
George W. Daneker ◽  
Charles A. Staley
2016 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Lewandowski ◽  
Larry Donahue ◽  
Attasit Chokechanachaisakul ◽  
Laura Kulik ◽  
Samdeep Mouli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Claudius Conrad ◽  
Kenneth K. Tanabe

Overview: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy of the liver that most often arises in patients with cirrhosis and other chronic liver diseases. Worldwide, it is the sixth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. Median survival is poor, ranging from 6 to 20 months. Definitive treatment options for HCC are surgical resection, ablation, or transplantation. The selection of patients for surgical resection is based on clinical findings, laboratory data, and imaging. Although a number of staging systems exist, all have their limitations. A multidisciplinary approach to patient selection for surgery that includes the input of an experienced liver surgeon assures optimal outcomes. Sound understanding of liver segmentation, modern surgical techniques, and the use of intraoperative ultrasound have led to a reported perioperative mortality rate below 3%, blood transfusion requirements of less than 10%, and 5-year survival rates of at least 50%. Advances in laparoscopic technique and technology have expanded the indications for a safe and oncologically appropriate minimally invasive resection. Deciding which treatment option to employ depends on tumor resectability and the degree of underlying liver disease, which is present in 80% to 85% of patients with HCC; however, despite these surgical advances, a high recurrence rate of 70% in patients with cirrhosis and a survival rate of 65% to 80% in well-selected transplant patients are expected. This article will focus on the evaluation and selection of patients for surgical intervention, considerations in selecting the appropriate type of resection, and expected outcomes following liver resection.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Chatterjee ◽  
Mengdi Yao ◽  
Yurie Sekigami ◽  
Yuanxin Liang ◽  
Salvatore Nardello

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 414-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Sotomayor ◽  
T.S. Ravikumar

Background Primary and metastatic tumors in the liver are difficult to treat. When surgical resection is not feasible, cryotherapy is one of the several alternative approaches. Methods The data on outcomes from hepatic resections are reviewed, and the rationale and techniques of performing cryosurgery for unresectable hepatic cancers are described. The literature is reviewed and combined with the experiences of the authors on cryosurgery for management of hepatic tumors. Results The indications and techniques for performing cryosurgery are now well established. The procedure is relatively safe, and long-term survival rates of over 20% may be achieved. Conclusion While cryotherapy is effective for localized tumors in the liver, additional adjuvant approaches are required to control disease in the untreated liver. Endoscopic techniques may minimize patient morbidity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-78
Author(s):  
Mathew Varghese ◽  
Gautam Chakrabarty ◽  
Sivaharan Thambapillay

ABSTRACT Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is now well-established as a treatment option for isolated compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Improvements in surgical technique, instrumentation, component design, and rapid rehabilitation has resulted good long-term survivorship and in the wider acceptance for UKA. The experiences from several centers have been key in the education of surgeons with regards to patient selection, technical considerations, and importantly avoiding common pitfalls can lead to early failure of the components. A younger patient may require revision in their lifetime, but modern UKA design allows this to be performed with minimal surgical difficulties and with good outcome. How to cite this article Chakrabarty G, Varghese M, Thambapillay S. Unicompartmental Arthroplasty of the knee. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2015;49(2):74-78.


2021 ◽  
Vol 38 (02) ◽  
pp. 176-181
Author(s):  
Vibhor Wadhwa ◽  
James A. Kashanian ◽  
Marc Schiffman ◽  
Timothy D. McClure

AbstractVaricocele refers to an abnormally dilated and tortuous pampiniform venous plexus within the spermatic cord. The prevalence of varicocele is reported to be approximately 15% in the general male population. Its incidence increases with age and has a higher incidence in infertile men. Varicocele treatment (surgical or interventional) is considered one of the most common therapies of reversible infertility in men. Percutaneous embolization offers nonsurgical, minimally invasive option for the treatment of varicoceles, requiring only minimal sedation. In this article, the authors review the clinical and technical details of percutaneous varicocele embolization with a summary of currently available evidence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document