Gastric Lipase: Characteristics and Biological Function of Preduodenal Digestive Lipases

Author(s):  
Margit Hamosh ◽  
Paul Hamosh
2001 ◽  
Vol 281 (1) ◽  
pp. G16-G28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Carrière ◽  
Christophe Renou ◽  
Stéphane Ransac ◽  
Véronique Lopez ◽  
Josiane De Caro ◽  
...  

The inhibition of digestive lipases by the antiobesity drug Orlistat along with lipolysis levels and fecal fat excretion were measured in healthy humans. Orlistat was found to be a powerful gastric lipase inhibitor, achieving 46.6–91.4% enzyme inhibition and thus greatly reducing gastric lipolysis of solid and liquid meals (11–33% of respective controls). Gastric lipase inhibition by Orlistat was extremely fast (half-inhibition time < 1 min). Duodenal lipolysis was reduced significantly by Orlistat given with the solid meal (32.6–37.6% of controls) but was only slightly reduced by Orlistat given with the liquid meal (74.5–100% of controls). Human pancreatic lipase (HPL) inhibition was found to be high (51.2–82.6%), however, regardless of the meal. These paradoxical results were explained when in vitro lipolysis experiments were performed. The rates of HPL inhibition by Orlistat were found to be similar with both types of meals (half-inhibition time 5–6 min), but the preemulsified triglycerides of the liquid meal were rapidly hydrolyzed by HPL before the enzyme was significantly inhibited by Orlistat. With the solid meal, the rate of hydrolysis of the meal triglycerides by HPL was slower than the rate of HPL inhibition by Orlistat. As predicted from the previous results, the effects of Orlistat on fat excretion levels were found to be much greater with the solid (40.5–57.4% of ingested fat) than with the liquid (4.2–18.8%) test meal.


Author(s):  
Stephen J. DeNigris ◽  
Margit Hamosh ◽  
Dinkar K. Kasbekar ◽  
Thomas C. Lee ◽  
Paul Hamosh

Author(s):  
Andrés L. Jaume

RESUMENEl presente artículo analiza las diferentes teorías que sobre el concepto de función se han vertido en los últimos cuarenta años y sus problemas. Respecto de los dos grandes enfoques (histórico-etiológico y sistémico) se sostiene que el primero, pese a su hegemonía histórica, presenta considerables dificultades y que la reflexión actual se centra cada vez más en la perspectiva sistémica. Esta última puede enfrentarse mejor a los diversos problemas que genera el concepto de función biológica y es siempre preferible.PALABRAS CLAVEFUNCIÓN BIOLÓGICA, FUNCIÓN SISTéMICA, EXPLICACIÓN FUNCIONAL, EXPLICACIÓN BASADA EN MECANISMOS, TELEOLOGíAABSTRACTThis paper analyzes the different theories on biological function and the problems they brought up over the last forty years. Concerning the two most important points of view on functions (aetiological theory and systemic theory) I hold that the aetiological theory, despite its historical hegemony, presents substantial difficulties and that the present philosophical thinking is centred on systemic theories. Systemic theories are capable of solving the various problems generated by the biological function concept which is preferable.KEYWORDSBIOLOGICAL FUNCTION, SySTEMIC FUNCTION, FUNCTIONAL EXPLANATION, MECHANISTIC EXPLANATION TELEOLOGY


2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 593
Author(s):  
Zongyong ZHANG ◽  
Bin LI ◽  
Jianfeng LIU ◽  
Li SU

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana-Natalia Murgoci ◽  
Khalil Mallah ◽  
Soulaimane Aboulouard ◽  
Christophe Lefebvre ◽  
Firas Kobeissy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document