Rectal Drug Delivery

Author(s):  
Hannah Batchelor
1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Umejima ◽  
Takahiro Harada ◽  
Nak-Seo Kim ◽  
Takahiro Uchida ◽  
Shigeru Goto

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 942-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trusha J. Purohit ◽  
Sara M. Hanning ◽  
Zimei Wu

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 247-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinke Xu ◽  
Mifong Tam ◽  
Sepideh Samaei ◽  
Sophie Lerouge ◽  
Jake Barralet ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-80
Author(s):  
Matea Bulić ◽  
Catherine Tuleu

Despite its unpopularity, the rectal route of paediatric drug administration remains of interest especially in pre-school children as it can overcome some drug delivery challenges with oral and parenteral routes. Few studies have been conducted on the use and acceptability of traditional rectal dosage forms (i.e., suppositories, enemas and gels) in different parts of the world. It showed that barrier to adoption could be linked with poor knowledge, little information and understanding of this administration modality. Reformulation for the rectal delivery of drugs intended for oral and/or parenteral administration that do not reach their full potential, was explored by a study at University College London. The top 3 candidates were Azithromycin, Amodiaquine and Raltegravir. Little rectal delivery innovation has occurred but topics such as acceptability and use of rectal drug delivery; types of rectal dosage forms and reformulation considerations are discussed presently in order to raise awareness around the need to modernise rectal dosage forms this to achieve the full potential for successful reformulation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Sebastian Scioli Montoto ◽  
Maria Esperanza Ruiz

1986 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.G.J. de Leede ◽  
A.G. de Boer ◽  
E. Pörtzgen ◽  
J. Feijen ◽  
D.D. Breimer

Author(s):  
Arthur R. Mlodozeniec ◽  
Larry Caldwell ◽  
Michael Jay ◽  
Robert M. Beihn ◽  
George A. Digenis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document