Thoracic Malignancies

Author(s):  
Matthew D. Jankowich
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. S297
Author(s):  
J. Whisenant ◽  
S. Wong ◽  
V. Torri ◽  
J. Revuelta ◽  
B. Halmos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S527
Author(s):  
S. Adebahr ◽  
E. Gkika ◽  
A. Brenner ◽  
T. Schimek-Jasch ◽  
G. Niedermann ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 347-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Isaac ◽  
Sherri O Stuver ◽  
Roger B Davis ◽  
Susan Block ◽  
Jane C Weeks ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Pain is common among cancer patients.OBJECTIVE: To characterize the incidence of severe pain among newly diagnosed patients with stage IV cancer in ambulatory care.METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 505 ambulatory oncology patients with newly diagnosed stage IV solid tumours at a comprehensive cancer centre (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) was followed from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006. Pain intensity scores were extracted from electronic medical records. The incidence of severe pain was calculated using the maximum monthly pain scores reported at outpatient visits.RESULTS: Of the 505 patients included in the present study, 340 (67.3%) were pain-free at the initial visit, 90 (17.8%) experienced mild pain, 48 (9.5%) experienced moderate pain and 27 (5.4%) experienced severe pain. At least one episode of severe pain within one year of diagnosis was reported by 29.1% of patients. Patients with head and neck, gastrointestinal and thoracic malignancies were more likely to experience severe pain compared with patients with other types of cancer (52.6%, 33.9% and 30.5%, respectively). In the multivariable model, patients whose primary language was not English (OR 2.90 [95% CI 1.08 to 7.80]), patients who reported severe pain at the initial visit (OR 9.30 [95% CI 3.72 to 23.23]) and patients with head and neck (OR 10.17 [95% CI 2.87 to 36.00]) or gastrointestinal (OR 4.05 [95% CI 1.23 to 13.35]) cancers were more likely to report severe pain in the following year.CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of severe pain was high in ambulatory patients with newly diagnosed stage IV cancer.


2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 1114-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhakar Mutyala ◽  
Alexandra Stewart ◽  
Atif J. Khan ◽  
Robert A. Cormack ◽  
Desmond O'Farrell ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G. Nicholson ◽  
Ming S. Tsao ◽  
William D. Travis ◽  
Deepa T. Patil ◽  
Francoise Galateau-Salle ◽  
...  

Context The Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, in conjunction with the International Mesothelioma Interest Group, the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group, and the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration, developed proposals for the 8th edition of their respective tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging classification systems. Objective To review these changes and discuss issues for the reporting pathologist. Data Sources Proposals were based on international databases of lung (N = 94 708), with an external validation using the US National Cancer Database; mesothelioma (N = 3519); thymic epithelial tumors (10 808); and epithelial cancers of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (N = 22 654). Conclusions These proposals have been mostly accepted by the Union for International Cancer Control and the American Joint Committee on Cancer and incorporated into their respective staging manuals (2017). The Union for International Cancer Control recommended implementation beginning in January 2017; however, the American Joint Committee on Cancer has deferred deployment of the eighth TNM until January 1, 2018, to ensure appropriate infrastructure for data collection. This manuscript summarizes the updated staging of thoracic malignancies, specifically highlighting changes from the 7th edition that are relevant to pathologic staging. Histopathologists should become familiar with, and start to incorporate, the 8th edition staging in their daily reporting of thoracic cancers henceforth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document