Estimating Hip Joint Contact Pressure from Geometric Features

Author(s):  
Ehsan Arbabi ◽  
Salman Chegini ◽  
Ronan Boulic ◽  
Stephen J Ferguson ◽  
Daniel Thalmann
2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. e12-e13
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Bhatia ◽  
Simon Lee ◽  
Elizabeth Shewman ◽  
Michael Salata ◽  
Charles Bush-Joseph ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2325967115S0000
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Bhatia ◽  
Simon Lee ◽  
Elizabeth Shewman ◽  
Charles A. Bush-Joseph ◽  
Michael Jonathan Salata ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 895-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiichi Genda ◽  
Norimasa Iwasaki ◽  
Guoan Li ◽  
Bruce A MacWilliams ◽  
Peter J Barrance ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrew E. Anderson ◽  
Steve A. Maas ◽  
Benjamin J. Ellis ◽  
Jeffrey A. Weiss

Simplified analytical approaches to estimate hip joint contact pressures using perfectly spherical geometry have been described in the literature (rigid body spring models); however, estimations based on these simulations have not corresponded well with experimental in vitro data. Recent evidence from our laboratory suggests that finite element (FE) models of the hip joint that incorporate detailed geometry for cartilage and bone can predict cartilage pressures in good agreement with experimental data [1]. However, it is unknown whether this degree of model complexity is necessary. The objective of this study was to compare cartilage contact pressure predictions from FE models with varying degrees of simplicity to elucidate which aspects of hip morphology are required to obtain accurate predictions of cartilage contact pressure. Models based on 1) subject-specific (SS) geometry, 2) spheres, and 3) rotational conchoids were analyzed.


2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Kitamura ◽  
Masanori Fujii ◽  
Miho Iwamoto ◽  
Satoshi Ikemura ◽  
Satoshi Hamai ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The ideal acetabular position for optimizing hip joint biomechanics in periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the relationship between acetabular correction in the coronal plane and joint contact pressure (CP) and identify morphological factors associated with residual abnormal CP after correction. Methods Using CT images from 44 patients with hip dysplasia, we performed three patterns of virtual PAOs on patient-specific 3D hip models; the acetabulum was rotated laterally to the lateral center-edge angles (LCEA) of 30°, 35°, and 40°. Finite-element analysis was used to calculate the CP of the acetabular cartilage during a single-leg stance. Results Coronal correction to the LCEA of 30° decreased the median maximum CP 0.5-fold compared to preoperatively (p <  0.001). Additional correction to the LCEA of 40° further decreased CP in 15 hips (34%) but conversely increased CP in 29 hips (66%). The increase in CP was associated with greater preoperative extrusion index (p = 0.030) and roundness index (p = 0.038). Overall, virtual PAO failed to normalize CP in 11 hips (25%), and a small anterior wall index (p = 0.049) and a large roundness index (p = 0.003) were associated with residual abnormal CP. Conclusions The degree of acetabular correction in the coronal plane where CP is minimized varied among patients. Coronal plane correction alone failed to normalize CP in 25% of patients in this study. In patients with an anterior acetabular deficiency (anterior wall index < 0.21) and an aspherical femoral head (roundness index > 53.2%), coronal plane correction alone may not normalize CP. Further studies are needed to clarify the effectiveness of multiplanar correction, including in the sagittal and axial planes, in optimizing the hip joint’s contact mechanics.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. S491-S492
Author(s):  
F. Araujo ◽  
C. Bernardes ◽  
G. Portella ◽  
L.F. Silveira ◽  
J. Loss

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Lee ◽  
Thomas H. Wuerz ◽  
Elizabeth Shewman ◽  
Frank M. McCormick ◽  
Michael J. Salata ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document