Five-Year Results of Endovascular Treatment with the Gore TAG Device Compared with Open Repair of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

Author(s):  
Jacques Kpodonu
2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 912-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel S. Makaroun ◽  
Ellen D. Dillavou ◽  
Grayson H. Wheatley ◽  
Richard P. Cambria

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinhard Scharrer-Pamler ◽  
Thomas Kotsis ◽  
Xaver Kapfer ◽  
Johannes Görich ◽  
Karl-Heinz Orend ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayo Sugiyama ◽  
Toru Iwahashi ◽  
Nobusato Koizumi ◽  
Toshiya Nishibe ◽  
Toshiki Fujiyoshi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is a relatively rare condition that is often life-threatening. Secondary AEF is a complication of previous surgery, which can be more critical and challenging than primary AEF. The number of secondary AEF is increasing due to increase in the number of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Although TEVAR has become a successful alternative surgical strategy for thoracic aortic aneurysms, secondary AEF after TEVAR might be critical than other secondary AEF because of severe adhesion between the esophagus and residual thoracic aortic wall. Methods This study analyzed six patients with secondary AEF who were treated at Tokyo Medical University Hospital between 2011 and 2016. These participants included four patients who had undergone TEVAR and two who had undergone total arch replacement. Results Although they were subsequently hospitalized for a long period, open surgical repair was completed in two patients who had undergone total arch replacement. TEVAR alone was performed in two patients who had undergone TEVAR and they were discharged without major complications shortly. Combined repair of TEVAR as a bridge to open surgery was planned for two patients who had undergone TEVAR. However, reconstruction of the aorta and esophagus could not be completed in these patients due to severe adhesions, and they died during hospitalization. Conclusions Definitive open repair was successfully performed in patients with secondary AEF after total arch replacement. However, in the patients with secondary AEF after TEVAR, severe adhesion between the aorta and esophagus led to difficulty in performing a successful definitive open repair. The strategy for secondary AEF should, therefore, be decided considering the etiology of secondary AEF. In secondary AEF after TEVAR, definitive open repair is difficult to complete because of catastrophic complication, and palliative treatment using TEVAR without reconstruction of aorta and esophagus can be an alternative.


2019 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Daniele Psacharopulo ◽  
Michelangelo Ferri ◽  
Emanuele Ferrero ◽  
Andrea Gaggiano ◽  
Guillaume Marques ◽  
...  

Vascular ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Andrassy ◽  
Rolf Weidenhagen ◽  
Georgios Meimarakis ◽  
M Rentsch ◽  
K-W Jauch ◽  
...  

Multiple reports could show a reduced risk for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) compared with open treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate our twelve-year TEVAR experience for thoracic aortic aneurysms and compare these results with open repair. All patients who had received either open or endovascular surgery for a degenerative aortic aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta in our center were evaluated retrospectively. N = 53 TEVAR patients (1997–2008) were included and their course was compared with an open-surgery group of n = 24 patients (1992–2002). The percentage of symptomatic patients was 43% (TEVAR) and 42% (open surgery). Endovascular treatment resulted in a significantly reduced 30-day (5.7% versus 25% P = 0.02) and one-year mortality (19% versus 42% P = 0.05) in the entire cohort. Symptomatic patients benefited the most from TEVAR (30-day mortality: 9% versus 40%, P = 0.06; one-year mortality: 27% versus 70%, P = 0.049) whereas the survival of our asymptomatic patients was not significantly different (30-day mortality: 3% versus 14%, P = 0.22; one-year mortality: 13% versus 21%, P = 0.65). Lastly, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significantly improved survival after TEVAR ( P = 0.05) and in particular for the symptomatic patients ( P = 0.003). In conclusion, endovascular treatment for patients with degenerative thoracic aortic aneurysms has significant advantages over open surgery.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e83601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Juszkat ◽  
Bartlomiej Perek ◽  
Bartosz Zabicki ◽  
Olga Trojnarska ◽  
Marek Jemielity ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. 1010-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raja R. Gopaldas ◽  
Tam K. Dao ◽  
Scott A. LeMaire ◽  
Joseph Huh ◽  
Joseph S. Coselli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document