Development as an Evolutionary Economic Process

Author(s):  
Richard R. Nelson
1972 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-424
Author(s):  
L. A. Boland
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuri Biondi

Abstract Many economic theories rely on equilibrium. Notwithstanding its widespread framing role, the very notion of equilibrium shows epistemic and methodological limits when confronted with space, time, human behaviour and institutions. A systemic perspective may upgrade equilibrium by considering the featuring roles of economic organisation (entity), money and accounting in the economic process. This article tributes to Martin Shubik’s scholarship and friendship by providing a systemic perspective on his last co-authored book with Eric Smith.


2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avi J Cohen ◽  
G. C Harcourt

We argue that the Cambridge capital theory controversies of the 1950s to 1970s were the latest in a series of still-unresolved controversies over three deep issues: explaining and justifying the return to capital; Joan Robinson's complaint that, due to path dependence, equilibrium is not an outcome of an economic process and therefore an inadequate tool for analyzing accumulation and growth; and the role of ideology and vision in fuelling controversy when results of simple models are not robust. We predict these important and relevant issues, latent in endogenous growth and real business cycle theories, will erupt in future controversy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-390
Author(s):  
K. E. Savchishina ◽  
V. S. Sutyagin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document