A Novel Probabilistic Projection Model for Multi-camera Object Tracking

Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems - Lecture Notes in Computer Science ◽

10.1007/978-3-030-23807-0_8 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 90-100

Author(s):

Jiaxin Lin ◽

Chun Xiao ◽

Disi Chen ◽

Dalin Zhou ◽

Zhaojie Ju ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Object Tracking ◽

Projection Model ◽

Probabilistic Projection

Download Full-text

Multiple-Object Tracking

Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) ◽

10.1027/1618-3169/a000085 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 58 (3) ◽

pp. 196-200 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

K. Botterill ◽

R. Allen ◽

P. McGeorge

Keyword(s):

Object Tracking ◽

Cognitive Processes ◽

Spatial Location ◽

Multiple Object Tracking ◽

Tracking Performance ◽

Multiple Object

The Multiple-Object Tracking paradigm has most commonly been utilized to investigate how subsets of targets can be tracked from among a set of identical objects. Recently, this research has been extended to examine the function of featural information when tracking is of objects that can be individuated. We report on a study whose findings suggest that, while participants can only hold featural information for roughly two targets this task does not affect tracking performance detrimentally and points to a discontinuity between the cognitive processes that subserve spatial location and featural information.

Download Full-text

Cognitive Components of Ingroup Projection

Social Psychology ◽

10.1027/1864-9335/a000156 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (1) ◽

pp. 15-30 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Maya Machunsky ◽

Thorsten Meiser

Keyword(s):

Mental Representation ◽

Cognitive Representation ◽

Social Categories ◽

Projection Model ◽

Minimal Group ◽

Model Experiments ◽

Superordinate Category ◽

Cognitive Components ◽

Per Se

This research investigated whether relative ingroup prototypicality (i.e., the tendency to perceive one’s own ingroup as more prototypical of a superordinate category than the outgroup) can result from a prototype-based versus exemplar-based mental representation of social categories, rather than from ingroup membership per se as previously suggested by the ingroup projection model. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that a prototype-based group was perceived as more prototypical of a superordinate category than an exemplar-based group supporting the hypothesis that an intergroup context is not necessary for biased prototypicality judgments. Experiment 3 introduced an intergroup context in a minimal-group-like paradigm. The findings demonstrated that both the kind of cognitive representation and motivational processes contribute to biased prototypicality judgments in intergroup settings.

Download Full-text