A Reduced-Order-Model Bayesian Obstacle Detection Algorithm

2020 ◽  
pp. 17-27
Author(s):  
Mahadevan Ganesh ◽  
Stuart C. Hawkins
Keyword(s):  
Detection Algorithm ◽  
Obstacle Detection ◽  
Reduced Order Model ◽  
Order Model ◽  
Reduced Order

scholarly journals An efficient Bayesian neural network surrogate algorithm for shape detection

2022 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. C112-C127
Author(s):  
Mahadevan Ganesh ◽  
Stuart Collin Hawkins ◽  
Nino Kordzakhia ◽  
Stefanie Unicomb
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Light Scattering ◽  
Inverse Problems ◽  
Inverse Scattering ◽  
Obstacle Detection ◽  
Reduced Order Model ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Order Model ◽  
Reduced Order ◽  
Comput Phys

We present an efficient Bayesian algorithm for identifying the shape of an object from noisy far field data. The data is obtained by illuminating the object with one or more incident waves. Bayes' theorem provides a framework to find a posterior distribution of the parameters that determine the shape of the scatterer. We compute the distribution using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with a Gibbs sampler. The principal novelty of this work is to replace the forward far-field-ansatz wave model (in an unbounded region) in the MCMC sampling with a neural-network-based surrogate that is hundreds of times faster to evaluate. We demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of our algorithm by constructing the distributions, medians and confidence intervals of non-convex shapes using a Gaussian random circle prior. References Y. Chen. Inverse scattering via Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Inv. Prob. 13 (1997), pp. 253–282. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/13/2/005 D. Colton and R. Kress. Inverse acoustic and electromagnetic scattering theory. 4th Edition. Vol. 93. Applied Mathematical Sciences. References C112 Springer, 2019. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-30351-8 R. DeVore, B. Hanin, and G. Petrova. Neural Network Approximation. Acta Num. 30 (2021), pp. 327–444. doi: 10.1017/S0962492921000052 M. Ganesh and S. C. Hawkins. A reduced-order-model Bayesian obstacle detection algorithm. 2018 MATRIX Annals. Ed. by J. de Gier et al. Springer, 2020, pp. 17–27. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-38230-8_2 M. Ganesh and S. C. Hawkins. Algorithm 975: TMATROM—A T-matrix reduced order model software. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 44.9 (2017), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1145/3054945 M. Ganesh and S. C. Hawkins. Scattering by stochastic boundaries: hybrid low- and high-order quantification algorithms. ANZIAM J. 56 (2016), pp. C312–C338. doi: 10.21914/anziamj.v56i0.9313 M. Ganesh, S. C. Hawkins, and D. Volkov. An efficient algorithm for a class of stochastic forward and inverse Maxwell models in R3. J. Comput. Phys. 398 (2019), p. 108881. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2019.108881 L. Lamberg, K. Muinonen, J. Ylönen, and K. Lumme. Spectral estimation of Gaussian random circles and spheres. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 136 (2001), pp. 109–121. doi: 10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00578-1 T. Nousiainen and G. M. McFarquhar. Light scattering by quasi-spherical ice crystals. J. Atmos. Sci. 61 (2004), pp. 2229–2248. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<2229:LSBQIC>2.0.CO;2 A. Palafox, M. A. Capistrán, and J. A. Christen. Point cloud-based scatterer approximation and affine invariant sampling in the inverse scattering problem. Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 40 (2017), pp. 3393–3403. doi: 10.1002/mma.4056 M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 378 (2019), pp. 686–707. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 A. C. Stuart. Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective. Acta Numer. 19 (2010), pp. 451–559. doi: 10.1017/S0962492910000061 B. Veihelmann, T. Nousiainen, M. Kahnert, and W. J. van der Zande. Light scattering by small feldspar particles simulated using the Gaussian random sphere geometry. J. Quant. Spectro. Rad. Trans. 100 (2006), pp. 393–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2005.11.053

Model Order Reduction of Transmission Line Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Transmission Line ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Original System ◽  
Reduced Order Model ◽  
Benchmark Problems ◽  
Transmission Line Model ◽  
Order Model ◽  
Line Model ◽  
Reduced Order ◽  
Numerical Effort

Transmission Line model are an important role in the electrical power supply. Modeling of such system remains a challenge for simulations are necessary for designing and controlling modern power systems.In order to analyze the numerical approach for a benchmark collection Comprehensive of some needful real-world examples, which can be utilized to evaluate and compare mathematical approaches for model reduction. The approach is based on retaining the dominant modes of the system and truncation comparatively the less significant once.as the reduced order model has been derived from retaining the dominate modes of the large-scale stable system, the reduction preserves the stability. The strong demerit of the many MOR methods is that, the steady state values of the reduced order model does not match with the higher order systems. This drawback has been try to eliminated through the Different MOR method using sssMOR tools. This makes it possible for a new assessment of the error system Offered that the Observability Gramian of the original system has as soon as been thought about, an H∞ and H2 error bound can be calculated with minimal numerical effort for any minimized model attributable to The reduced order model (ROM) of a large-scale dynamical system is essential to effortlessness the study of the system utilizing approximation Algorithms. The response evaluation is considered in terms of response constraints and graphical assessments. the application of Approximation methods is offered for arising ROM of the large-scale LTI systems which consist of benchmark problems. The time response of approximated system, assessed by the proposed method, is also shown which is excellent matching of the response of original system when compared to the response of other existing approaches .

Theoretical and practical identifiability of a reduced order model in an activated sludge process doing nitrification and denitrification

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 309-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Julien ◽  
J. P. Babary ◽  
P. Lessard
Keyword(s):  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Reduced Order Model ◽  
Actual Behavior ◽  
Activated Sludge Process ◽  
Order Model ◽  
Identifiability Analysis ◽  
Reduced Order ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Nitrification And Denitrification ◽  
Line Oxygen

This paper deals with the structural identifiability and the identification of the parameters of a reduced order model used for control of a single reactor activated sludge process doing nitrification and denitrification. This reduced order model is splitted into two submodels, one 3-dimensional state submodel in aerobic conditions and one 2-dimensional state submodel in anoxic conditions. The identifiability analysis is based on on-line oxygen and nitrate concentrations data. It has been shown that the reduced order model is structurally identifiable. The parameter identification has been carried out by using the simplex method of Nelder and Mead. Simulation results performed over a range of six hours (two aerobic/anoxic cycles), show that there exists a good fit between the simulated solution and the actual behavior of a lab scale pilot plant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document