AbstractIt is well known that a linear-based controller is only valid near the point from which the linearised system is obtained. The question remains as to how far one can move away from that point before the linear and nonlinear responses differ significantly, resulting in the controller failing to achieve the desired performance. In this paper, we propose a method to quantify these differences. By appending a harmonic oscillator to the equations of motion, the frequency responses at different operating points of a nonlinear system can be generated using numerical continuation. In the presence of strong nonlinearities, subtle differences exist between the linear and nonlinear frequency responses, and these variations are also reflected in the step responses. A systematic way of comparing the discrepancies between the linear and the nonlinear frequency responses is presented, which can determine whether the controller performs as predicted by linear-based design. We demonstrate the method on a simple fixed-gain Duffing system and a gain-scheduled reduced-order aircraft model with a manoeuvre-demand controller; the latter presents a case where strong nonlinearities exist in the form of multiple attractors. The analysis is then expanded to include actuator rate saturation, which creates a limit-cycle isola, coexisting multiple solutions (corresponding to the so-called flying qualities cliff), and chaotic motions. The proposed method can infer the influence of these additional attractors even when there is no systematic way to detect them. Finally, when severe rate saturation is present, reducing the controller gains can mitigate—but not eliminate—the risk of limit-cycle oscillation.
Comparison Between Control-Based Continuation and Phase-Locked Loop Methods for the Identification of Backbone Curves and Nonlinear Frequency Responses
