The Competition State

2020 ◽  
pp. 95-132
Author(s):  
Gábor Scheiring
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Chin-Hao Huang ◽  
David C. Kang

Abstract State formation occurred in Korea and Japan 1,000 years before it did in Europe, and it occurred for reasons of emulation and learning, not bellicist competition. State formation in historical East Asia occurred under a hegemonic system in which war was relatively rare, not under a balance-of-power system with regular existential threats. Korea and Japan emerged as states between the fifth and ninth centuries CE and existed for centuries thereafter with centralized bureaucratic control defined over territory and administrative capacity to tax their populations, field large militaries, and provide extensive public goods. They created these institutions not to wage war or suppress revolt: the longevity of dynasties in these countries is evidence of both the peacefulness of their region and their internal stability. Rather, Korea and Japan developed state institutions through emulation and learning from China. The elites of both copied Chinese civilization for reasons of prestige and domestic legitimacy in the competition between the court and the nobility.


2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Evans
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (03) ◽  
pp. 63-66
Author(s):  
Gülarə Məzahir qızıCahangirli ◽  

Key words: unfair competition, state regulation, state policies


Author(s):  
Dan Horsfall ◽  
John Hudson

This concluding chapter highlights key arguments from across the book in order to set out an integrated agenda for future research. Theoretically rooted analyses must be at the core of such an agenda. The inter-pollination/cross-fertilisation of ideas from many disciplines is important in developing an understanding of the complex and multi-faceted ways in which competition is influencing welfare states. However, while theory is central to this agenda, it must also be rooted in detailed empirical analysis. In looking to transcend the competition state/welfare state dichotomy, this interplay between theory and evidence is key, and where theoretically rooted social policy analysts can add particular value to current debates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document