Application of a Pictorial Scale of Human Energy in Ecological Momentary Assessment Research

Author(s):  
Fabienne Lambusch ◽  
Oliver Weigelt ◽  
Michael Fellmann ◽  
Katja Siestrup
2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason L. Scott ◽  
Angela J. Wozencroft ◽  
Steven N. Waller

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 1111-1111
Author(s):  
Jason R. Hackett ◽  
Daniel Clark ◽  
Susan Ofner ◽  
Wanzhu Tu ◽  
NiCole R. Keith

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 1222-1230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly C. Berg ◽  
Li Cao ◽  
Ross D. Crosby ◽  
Scott G. Engel ◽  
Carol B. Peterson ◽  
...  

Mindfulness ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 2455-2469
Author(s):  
Matthew C. Enkema ◽  
Lauren McClain ◽  
Elizabeth R. Bird ◽  
Max A. Halvorson ◽  
Mary E. Larimer

Assessment ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 107319112097685
Author(s):  
Aja Louise Murray ◽  
Manuel Eisner ◽  
Denis Ribeaud ◽  
Tom Booth

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) holds significant potential within aggression research. It affords researchers the possibility of collecting data in ecological context, in near real time. However, there is a lack of measures of aggression that have been developed and validated for use in EMA contexts. In this study, we report on the validation of a measure specifically designed to address this need: the Aggression-ES-A. Building on a previous pilot study, we evaluate the within- and between-person reliability, nomological net and associations with a validated trait measure of aggression of the Aggression-ES-A in a sample of N = 255 emerging adults from the Zurich Project on Social Development from Childhood to Adulthood (z-proso). Using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling, we found support for the factorial validity, reliability, and concurrent validity of the Aggression-ES-A scores. Results support the use of the Aggression-ES-A in EMA studies utilizing community-ascertained samples.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D. Soyster ◽  
Aaron Jason Fisher

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a data collection method that involves repeated sampling of participants’ real-time experience and behavior as they unfold in context. A primary challenge in EMA research is to design surveys that adequately assess constructs of interest while minimizing participant burden. To achieve this balance, researchers must make decisions regarding which constructs should be included and how those constructs should be assessed. To date, a dearth of direction exists for how to best design and carry out EMA studies. The lack of guidelines renders it difficult to systematically compare findings across EMA studies. Study design decisions may be improved by including input from potential research participants (stakeholders). The goal of the present paper is to introduce a general approach for including stakeholders in the development of EMA research design. Rather than suggesting rigid prescriptive guidelines (e.g., the correct number of survey items), we present a systematic and reproducible process through which extant research and stakeholder experience can be leveraged to make design decisions. To that end, we report methods and results for a series of focus group discussions with current tobacco users that were conducted to inform the design of an EMA study aimed at identifying person-specific mechanisms driving tobacco use. We conclude by providing recommendations for item-selection procedures in EMA studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document