Maxillofacial Reconstruction: From Autogenous Bone Grafts to Bone Tissue Engineering

2020 ◽  
pp. 353-364
Author(s):  
Fernando P. S. Guastaldi ◽  
Toru Takusagawa ◽  
Joseph P. McCain ◽  
Joao L. G. C. Monteiro ◽  
Maria J. Troulis
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Maxillofacial Reconstruction ◽  
Autogenous Bone Grafts

Mineralized Nanofibers for Bone Tissue Engineering

2018 ◽  
pp. 461-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozan Karaman
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Tissue Engineering Scaffolds ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Biomimetic Scaffolds

The limitation of orthopedic fractures and large bone defects treatments has brought the focus on fabricating bone grafts that could enhance ostegenesis and vascularization in-vitro. Developing biomimetic materials such as mineralized nanofibers that can provide three-dimensional templates of the natural bone extracellular-matrix is one of the most promising alternative for bone regeneration. Understanding the interactions between the structure of the scaffolds and cells and therefore the control cellular pathways are critical for developing functional bone grafts. In order to enhance bone regeneration, the engineered scaffold needs to mimic the characteristics of composite bone ECM. This chapter reviews the fabrication of and fabrication techniques for fabricating biomimetic bone tissue engineering scaffolds. In addition, the chapter covers design criteria for developing the scaffolds and examples of enhanced osteogenic differentiation outcomes by fabricating biomimetic scaffolds.

Comparison on the Osteogenesis Potential between Poly(lactide-Co-Glycolide) and Alginate as Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold In Vivo

2007 ◽  
Vol 330-332 ◽  
pp. 1173-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Li ◽  
Run Liang Chen ◽  
Lei Liu ◽  
Yun Feng Lin ◽  
Wei Dong Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Stromal Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow Stromal Cells ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Tissue Engineering Scaffold ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Mechanical Characters

Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and alginate(AG) are the most promising scaffolds in the bone tissue engineering for their stable mechanical characters and three-dimensional porous structure. This study aimed to assay the in vivo osteogenesis potentials by loading the autogenous bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) on PLGA or AG. The results suggested that PLGA and AG are both ideal bone tissue engineering scaffold. BMSCs/AG has stronger osteogenesis potentials in vivo than BMSCs/PLGA.

Comparison among Four Kinds of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold

2007 ◽  
Vol 330-332 ◽  
pp. 963-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Liu ◽  
Run Liang Chen ◽  
Yun Feng Lin ◽  
Cai Li ◽  
Wei Dong Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Stromal Cells ◽  
Bone Marrow Stromal Cells ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Marrow Stromal Cells ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Calvarial Defects ◽  
Reconstruction Of Bone Defects

Bone tissue engineering is a promising way to repair of bone defects. To choose a proper scaffold is still a disputable problem in bone tissue engineering. This study aimed to compare the effects of repairing critical calvarial defects with the compounds of autogenous bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and coral hydroxyapatite(CHA), hydroxyapatite/ tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and alginate (AG). The results showed that CHA and AG were satisfactory bone tissues engineering scaffolds among the four kinds of materials. BMSCs/CHA and BMSCs/AG are promising techniques for reconstruction of bone defects.

Joint construction of micro-vibration stimulation and BCP scaffolds for enhanced bioactivity and self-adaptability tissue engineered bone grafts

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (19) ◽  
pp. 4278-4288
Author(s):  
Jinjie Wu ◽  
Taijun Chen ◽  
Zhenxiong Wang ◽  
Xuening Chen ◽  
Shuxin Qu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Bone Defects ◽  
Major Difficulty ◽  
Joint Construction ◽  
Promising Treatment ◽  
Micro Vibration

The bone defects caused by trauma and disease have become a major difficulty in the treatment of clinical bone defects, and bone tissue engineering has become a promising treatment strategy.

Mineralized Nanofibers for Bone Tissue Engineering

2017 ◽  
pp. 200-218
Author(s):  
Ozan Karaman
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Tissue Engineering Scaffolds ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Biomimetic Scaffolds

The limitation of orthopedic fractures and large bone defects treatments has brought the focus on fabricating bone grafts that could enhance ostegenesis and vascularization in-vitro. Developing biomimetic materials such as mineralized nanofibers that can provide three-dimensional templates of the natural bone extracellular-matrix is one of the most promising alternative for bone regeneration. Understanding the interactions between the structure of the scaffolds and cells and therefore the control cellular pathways are critical for developing functional bone grafts. In order to enhance bone regeneration, the engineered scaffold needs to mimic the characteristics of composite bone ECM. This chapter reviews the fabrication of and fabrication techniques for fabricating biomimetic bone tissue engineering scaffolds. In addition, the chapter covers design criteria for developing the scaffolds and examples of enhanced osteogenic differentiation outcomes by fabricating biomimetic scaffolds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document