Improving Human Players’ T-Spin Skills in Tetris with Procedural Problem Generation

Author(s):  
Taishi Oikawa ◽  
Chu-Hsuan Hsueh ◽  
Kokolo Ikeda
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Runco ◽  
Ahmed M. Abdulla ◽  
Sue Hyeon Paek ◽  
Fatima A. Al-Jasim ◽  
Hanadi N. Alsuwaidi

AbstractDivergent thinking (DT) tests are probably the most commonly used measures of creative potential. Several extensive batteries are available but most research relies on one or two specific tests rather than a complete battery. This may limit generalizations because tests of DT are not equivalent. They are not always highly inter-correlated. Additionally, some DT tests appear to be better than others at eliciting originality. This is critical because originality is vital for creativity. The primary purpose of the present study was to determine which test of DT elicits the most originality. Seven measures of DTwere administered on a sample of 611 participants in eight Arabic countries. The tests were Figural, Titles, Realistic Presented Problems, Realistic Problem Generation, Instances, Uses, and Similarities. The Quick Test of Convergent Thinking, Runco’s Ideational Behavior Scale, and a demographic questionnaire were also administered. A linear mixed model analysis confirmed that the originality scores in the DT tests differed by test. Post-hoc tests indicated that the Titles and Realistic Problem Generation tests produced the highest mean originality scores, whereas the Realistic Presented Problems test produced the lowest mean originality scores. These differences confirm that research using only one DT test will not provide generalizable results.


1979 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard S. Adelman

As the diagnosis of learning disabilities has become widespread and commonplace, considerable debate has raged over the issue of labeling. Since the polemics have generated some confusion, it is important that professionals not lose sight of the major purposes and serious concerns related to diagnostic practices. In a two-part series, Adelman will (1) highlight why diagnostic procedures are necessary and why it is difficult to arrive at a valid diagnosis and (2) offer some perspectives on research and ethical considerations related to current LD diagnostic practices. In this first article, discussion of purposes and problems involved in diagnosing LD focuses on three topics: (a) how diagnosis relates to other assessment activity, (b) the objectives of diagnostic classification, and (c) specific conceptual concerns regarding the LD label.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document