Even theory can be fun: the exciting growth of knowledge in electrothermal AAS

Author(s):  
Gerhard Schlemmer ◽  
Bernard Radziuk
1971 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-108
Author(s):  
MELVIN H. MARX
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
Belalov R.M.

The aim of the work was to study the features of pedagogical control of schoolchildren's learning in a modern general education school. Research methods: theoretical: a review of psychological and pedagogical literature on research issues. The advantages of the system for assessing the degree of training are that each subsequent parameter is qualitatively higher than the previous one, and the system as a whole assesses the growth of knowledge and skills of students and the proposed parameters are convenient to operate in practice during the current assessment of knowledge, skills and abilities of students. The disadvantage of the system - the last parameter - "transfer" - characterizes as the student's ability to solve problems of a heuristic and creative type, ie. this stage requires detailing. The teaching function of control is to determine the content, techniques and methods of control, which are educational in nature. Any controlling task, except for the controlling function, trains students in the implementation of specific educational actions, ensuring a more solid mastery of these actions. The controlling task includes an element of novelty in the informative and substantive terms, providing an expansion of the cognitive horizons of students, developing and increasing the learning value of control. It is difficult to eliminate the subjective element of pedagogical control due to various circumstances: the designation of learning outcomes is rather arbitrary: knowledge, abilities, skills, assimilation, academic performance, etc .; methods of direct measurement of educational activity have not been developed, and it is judged indirectly by the answers, by the actions of students. Pedagogical control is an important component of the educational process that influences the result, the course of training and education. This problem is one of the most urgent in teaching practice.


2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-355
Author(s):  
Javier Alfonso Gil

Because bioeconomics is born of the interaction between the biological activity system and its socio-economic activity system, a holistic methodological approach is essential to study the relations between them. However, it must search for increasing levels of reductionism within each discipline to delve into the ultimate nature of each one of the intervening forces, whether economic or biological. This paper explores the economic forces. Through the biological capacity to comprehend, man and by extension, society, accumulates knowledge, the fulcrum from which he is able to dominate over his natural habitat. From this ‘point d’appui’, man builds two basic tools to assist him in achieving the goal of bettering his social condition. On the one hand, he creates institutions that allow him to “live with others” and, on the other, he develops technology that helps him to “live better with others”. Institutions, also referred to as ‘social technology’, tend toward stability over time while technology or ‘material technology’, tends toward instability, which would suggest that, normally, the mechanics of change will originate in material technology and, from there, progress to social technology by way of the political market. The level of progress and development attained depends on the quantity and rate of growth of knowledge applied by a society. In the process, man and his collectivity are forced to adopt new views of their environment through new shared mental models. The concurrence of equipment and political market will ultimately become the prime mover of institutional and economic change as well as change in mentality. Both technologies must keep on an adaptive course of stable evolution since discrepancies arising between them can cause tension between the various social groups. Adequate management of technological shock is essential to avoid extreme situations of social conflict. Herein lie the most important political decisions that a government must confront over the long term.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-488

RAPID GROWTH of knowledge of human chromosomes in several laboratories, following advances in technical methods, has developed a number of systems by which they are named. This has led to confusion in the literature and so to the need for resolving the differences. Consequently, Dr. C. E. Ford suggested that a study group convene to attempt to formulate a common system of nomenclature. The meeting was held in the University of Colorado, under the auspices of the Medical School with the support of the American Cancer Society. For practical reasons, the group was limited to those human cytologists who had already published karyotypes. In addition, three counselors were invited to guide and aid the discussions and, if necessary, to arbitrate. Fortunately the last proved unnecessary, and it was possible to arrive at a common system with flexibility by mutual agreement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document