Gene therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: clinical studies

Author(s):  
Thomas S. Muzzonigro ◽  
Richard Kang ◽  
Julio Reinecke ◽  
Peter Wehling ◽  
Mary C. Wasko ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
F. Apparailly ◽  
P. Plence ◽  
D. Noel ◽  
C. Jorgensen

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1877-1887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen Geurts ◽  
Leo AB Joosten ◽  
Nozomi Takahashi ◽  
Onno J Arntz ◽  
Anton Glück ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-141
Author(s):  
Isao Itoh ◽  
Koichi Amano ◽  
Jun Koide ◽  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
Takami Matsuyama ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 197-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D. Robbins ◽  
Christopher H. Evans ◽  
Yuti Chernajovsky

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Liu ◽  
Kazutaka Maeyama

Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrei A. Deviatkin ◽  
Yulia A. Vakulenko ◽  
Ludmila V. Akhmadishina ◽  
Vadim V. Tarasov ◽  
Marina I. Beloukhova ◽  
...  

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic inflammatory joint disease affecting about 1% of the population worldwide. Current treatment approaches do not ensure a cure for every patient. Moreover, classical regimens are based on nontargeted systemic immune suppression and have significant side effects. Biological treatment has advanced considerably but efficacy and specificity issues remain. Gene therapy is one of the potential future directions for RA therapy, which is rapidly developing. Several gene therapy trials done so far have been of moderate success, but experimental and genetics studies have yielded novel targets. As a result, the arsenal of gene therapy tools keeps growing. Currently, both viral and nonviral delivery systems are used for RA therapy. Herein, we review recent approaches for RA gene therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S409-S409
Author(s):  
A Clarke ◽  
J Di Paolo ◽  
B Downie ◽  
A Meng ◽  
N Mollova ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inhibitors of the Janus kinase-signal transducers and activators of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Differences in selectivity of JAK inhibitors for JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and TYK2 may influence their respective safety profiles, and the mechanisms responsible are not currently known. Filgotinib (FIL), a JAK1 inhibitor, did not negatively impact haemoglobin, LDL:HDL ratios or natural killer (NK) cell counts in clinical trials. Here, we compare the in vitro mechanistic profiles of four JAK inhibitors at clinically relevant doses. Methods JAK inhibitors (FIL, FIL metabolite [GS-829845], baricitinib [BARI], tofacitinib [TOFA], and upadacitinib [UPA]) were evaluated in vitro in human-cell-based assays. Growth of erythroid progenitors from human cord blood CD34+ cells was assessed using a HemaTox™ liquid expansion assay, NK cell proliferation was induced by IL-15 and LXR agonist-induced cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) expression was assessed in the hepatic cell line, HepG2. Using assay-generated IC50 values and the reported human plasma concentrations from clinical studies, we calculated the target coverage for each JAK inhibitor at clinically relevant doses. The activity of FIL in humans was based on PK/PD modelling of FIL + GS-829845. Results Inhibition of cellular activity was calculated for each JAK inhibitor based on in vitro dose-response data, human exposure data and modelled PK/PD relationships. At clinically relevant doses, FIL resulted in lower calculated inhibition of NK cell proliferation compared with other JAK inhibitors. FIL 100 mg and 200 mg also reduced CETP expression, whereas other JAK inhibitors had no effect. There was no difference in the effect of FIL vs. other JAK inhibitors on erythroid progenitor cell differentiation or maturation. Conclusion FIL, a JAK1 inhibitor, resulted in less inhibition of NK cell proliferation compared with BARI, TOFA, and UPA. FIL also reduced LXR agonist-induced CETP expression, while the other inhibitors did not alter these levels. These results provide a potential mechanistic link between the observed reduction of CETP concentration following FIL treatment and the previously observed reduction in the LDL:HDL ratio in RA patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document