Considering Misconceptions in Automatic Essay Scoring with A-TEST - Amrita Test Evaluation and Scoring Tool

Author(s):  
Prema Nedungadi ◽  
Jyothi L ◽  
Raghu Raman
2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
MICHELE G. SULLIVAN
Keyword(s):  

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement 14) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven E. Stemler

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald T. Kellogg ◽  
Alison P. Whiteford ◽  
Thomas Quinlan

1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-109
Author(s):  
Rohmad Qomari

To carry out evaluation comprehensively, we need appropriate instrument that suitable with domain that being evaluated. Evaluation instrument development with test has been conducted by experts. These instruments were only suitable to measure cognitive domain and part of psychomotor domain. To measure affective domain, we need to develop non-test evaluation instrument (alternative test). The development of this instrument tends to more difficult and complicated compare with instrument test evaluation instrument. Therefore, it does necessitate a through study to derive and elaborate affective domain to specific aspect to develop valid and reliable instrument.


2019 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-30
Author(s):  
Kateřina Rysová ◽  
Magdaléna Rysová ◽  
Michal Novák ◽  
Jiří Mírovský ◽  
Eva Hajičová

Abstract In the paper, we present EVALD applications (Evaluator of Discourse) for automated essay scoring. EVALD is the first tool of this type for Czech. It evaluates texts written by both native and non-native speakers of Czech. We describe first the history and the present in the automatic essay scoring, which is illustrated by examples of systems for other languages, mainly for English. Then we focus on the methodology of creating the EVALD applications and describe datasets used for testing as well as supervised training that EVALD builds on. Furthermore, we analyze in detail a sample of newly acquired language data – texts written by non-native speakers reaching the threshold level of the Czech language acquisition required e.g. for the permanent residence in the Czech Republic – and we focus on linguistic differences between the available text levels. We present the feature set used by EVALD and – based on the analysis – we extend it with new spelling features. Finally, we evaluate the overall performance of various variants of EVALD and provide the analysis of collected results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document