Right Colectomy Procedure Guide

2015 ◽  
pp. 121-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Olino ◽  
Tushar Samdani ◽  
Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Keyword(s):  
Right Colectomy

scholarly journals Ileo-colic intra-corporeal anastomosis during robotic right colectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of different techniques

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Guadagni ◽  
Matteo Palmeri ◽  
Matteo Bianchini ◽  
Desirée Gianardi ◽  
Niccolò Furbetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Double Layer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Right Colectomy ◽  
Layer Versus ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Common Technique ◽  
Technical Details ◽  
Robotic Right Colectomy ◽  
Mechanical Anastomosis

Abstract Purpose Robotic assistance could increase the rate of ileo-colic intra-corporeal anastomosis (ICA) during robotic right colectomy (RRC). However, although robotic ICA can be accomplished with several different technical variants, it is not clear whether some of these technical details should be preferred. An evaluation of the possible advantage of one respect to another would be useful. Methods We conducted a systematic review of literature on technical details of robotic ileo-colic ICA, from which we performed a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. The extracted data allowed a comparative analysis regarding the outcome of overall complication (OC), bleeding rate (BR) and leakage rate (LR), between (1) mechanical anastomosis with robotic stapler, versus laparoscopic stapler, versus totally hand-sewn anastomosis and (2) closure of enterocolotomy with manual double layer, versus single layer, versus stapled. Results A total of 30 studies including 2066 patients were selected. Globally, the side-to-side, isoperistaltic anastomosis, realized with laparoscopic staplers, and double-layer closure for enterocolotomy, is the most common technique used. According to the meta-analysis, the use of robotic stapler was significantly associated with a reduction of the BR with respect to mechanical anastomosis with laparoscopic stapler or totally hand-sewn anastomosis. None of the other technical aspects significantly influenced the outcomes. Conclusions ICA fashioning during RRC can be accomplished with several technical variants without evidence of a clear superiority of anyone of these techniques. Although the use of robotic staplers could be associated with some benefits, further studies are necessary to draw conclusions.

scholarly journals Securing the surgical field for mobilization of right-sided colon cancer using the duodenum-first multidirectional approach in laparoscopic surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Nagayoshi ◽  
S. Nagai ◽  
K. P. Zaguirre ◽  
K. Hisano ◽  
M. Sada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Right Colectomy ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Medial Approach ◽  
Total Operative Time ◽  
Advanced Tumors

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of the duodenum-first multidirectional approach (DMA) in laparoscopic right colectomy with those of the conventional medial approach to assess its safety and feasibility. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 120 patients who had laparoscopic surgery for right-sided colon cancer in our institution between April 2013 and December 2019. Fifty-four patients underwent colectomy using the multidirectional approach; among these, 20 underwent the DMA and 34 underwent the caudal-first multidirectional approach (CMA). Sixty-six patients underwent the conventional medial approach. Complications within 30 days of surgery were compared between the groups. Results There were 54 patients in the multidirectional group [29 females, median age 72 years (range 36–91 years)] and 66 in the medial group [42 females, median age 72 years (range 41–91 years)]. Total operative time was significantly shorter in multidirectional approach patients than conventional medial approach patients (208 min vs. 271 min; p = 0.01) and significantly shorter in patients who underwent the DMA compared to the CMA (201 min vs. 269 min; p < 0.001). Operative time for the mobilization procedure was also significantly shorter in patients who underwent the DMA (131 min vs. 181 min; p < 0.001). Blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications did not differ. In 77 patients with advanced T3/T4 tumors, the DMA, CMA, and conventional medial approach were performed in 13, 21, and 43 patients, respectively. Total operative time and operative time of the mobilization procedure were significantly shorter in patients undergoing DMA. Blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications did not differ. R0 resection was achieved in all patients with advanced tumors. Conclusions The DMA in laparoscopic right colectomy is safe and feasible and can achieve R0 resection with a shorter operative time than the conventional medial approach, even in patients with advanced tumors.

Simple laparoscopically-assisted right colectomy: Comparison to the standard open operation

1998 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. A1393
Author(s):  
RA Hodin ◽  
PM Mowschenson ◽  
M Bayme
Keyword(s):  
Right Colectomy ◽  
Open Operation

Laparoscopic right colectomy in patients treated with previous gastrectomy

Surgery Today ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Ikeda ◽  
Yosuke Fukunaga ◽  
Takashi Akiyoshi ◽  
Tsuyoshi Konishi ◽  
Yoshiya Fujimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Right Colectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Right Colectomy

Effects of age after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: Are there any specific outcomes?

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 562-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Denet ◽  
David Fuks ◽  
Francesca Cocco ◽  
Sophie Chopinet ◽  
Marcel Abbas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Right Colectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Right Colectomy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document