Intracavitary Brachytherapy: Techniques, Data, Toxicity

2016 ◽  
pp. 273-283
Author(s):  
Rakesh R. Patel
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tugana Akbas ◽  
Gamze Ugurluer ◽  
Meltem Acil ◽  
Taner Arpaci ◽  
Meltem Serin

Author(s):  
Divyesh Kumar ◽  
G. Y. Srinivasa ◽  
Ankita Gupta ◽  
Bhavana Rai ◽  
Arun S. Oinam ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Carcinoma cervix is amongst the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in women population worldwide. High-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) post external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is the standard of care in managing locally advanced stage cervical cancer patients. HDR-ICBT is generally performed under general anaesthesia (GA) in operation theatre (OT), but due to logistic reasons, sometimes, it becomes difficult to accommodate all patients under GA. Since prolonged overall treatment time (OTT) makes the results inferior, taking patients in day care setup under procedural sedation (PS) can be an effective alternative. In this audit, we tried to retrospectively analyse the dosimetric difference, if any, in patients who underwent ICBT at our centre, under either GA in OT or PS in day care. Results Thirty five patients were analysed 16/35 (45.71%) patients underwent HDR-ICBT under GA while 19/35 (54.28%) patients under PS. In both groups, a statistically significant difference was observed between the dose received by 0.1 cc as well as 2 cc of rectum (p < 0.05), while the bladder and sigmoid colon had comparable dosages. Conclusion Though our dosimetric analysis highlighted better rectal sparing in patients undergoing HDR-ICBT under GA when compared to patients under PS, PS can still be considered an effective alternative, especially in centres dealing with significant patient load. Further studies are required for firm conclusion.


2021 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. S148
Author(s):  
R. Rangarajan ◽  
S. Subramaniam ◽  
K. Gopalakrishnan ◽  
K. K

2012 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. S101
Author(s):  
T. Toita ◽  
R. Kitagawa ◽  
T. Hamano ◽  
K. Umayahara ◽  
Y. Hirashima ◽  
...  

Brachytherapy ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S56-S57
Author(s):  
Lisa Klepczyk ◽  
Sui Shen ◽  
Jun Duan ◽  
Robert Y. Kim

2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
pp. 677-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshifumi Oku ◽  
Hidetaka Arimura ◽  
Tran Thi Thao Nguyen ◽  
Yoshiyuki Hiraki ◽  
Masahiko Toyota ◽  
...  

Abstract This study investigates whether in-room computed tomography (CT)-based adaptive treatment planning (ATP) is robust against interfractional location variations, namely, interfractional organ motions and/or applicator displacements, in 3D intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) for uterine cervical cancer. In ATP, the radiation treatment plans, which have been designed based on planning CT images (and/or MR images) acquired just before the treatments, are adaptively applied for each fraction, taking into account the interfractional location variations. 2D and 3D plans with ATP for 14 patients were simulated for 56 fractions at a prescribed dose of 600 cGy per fraction. The standard deviations (SDs) of location displacements (interfractional location variations) of the target and organs at risk (OARs) with 3D ATP were significantly smaller than those with 2D ATP (P &lt; 0.05). The homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) and tumor control probability (TCP) in 3D ATP were significantly higher for high-risk clinical target volumes than those in 2D ATP. The SDs of the HI, CI, TCP, bladder and rectum D2cc, and the bladder and rectum normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) in 3D ATP were significantly smaller than those in 2D ATP. The results of this study suggest that the interfractional location variations give smaller impacts on the planning evaluation indices in 3D ATP than in 2D ATP. Therefore, the 3D plans with ATP are expected to be robust against interfractional location variations in each treatment fraction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document