Multi-objective Optimization of a Two-Stage Micro-turbine for Combined Heat and Power Production

2016 ◽  
pp. 143-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Majid AmirAlipour ◽  
Shoaib Khanmohammadi ◽  
Kazem Atashkari ◽  
Ramin KouhiKamali
Author(s):  
Doan V. K. Khanh ◽  
Pandian Vasant ◽  
Irraivan Elamvazuthi ◽  
Vo N. Dieu

In this chapter, the technical issues of two-stage TEC were discussed. After that, a new method of optimizing the dimension of TECs using differential evolution to maximize the cooling rate and coefficient of performance was proposed. A input current to hot side and cold side of and the number ratio between the hot stage and cold stage are searched the optima solutions. Thermal resistance is taken into consideration. The results of optimization obtained by using differential evolution were validated by comparing with those obtained by using genetic algorithm and show better performance in terms of stability, computational efficiency, robustness. This work revealed that differential evolution more stable than genetic algorithm and the Pareto front obtained from multi-objective optimization balances the important role between cooling rate and coefficient of performance.


2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behnam Yazdi ◽  
Behdad Yazdi ◽  
Mehdi Ehyaei ◽  
Abolfazl Ahmadi

In this paper, a comprehensive thermodynamic modeling and multi-objective optimization of a micro turbine cycle in combined heat and power generation, which provides 100KW of electric power. This CHP System is composed of air compressor, combustion chamber (CC), Air Preheater, Gas Turbine (GT) and a Heat Recovery Heat Exchanger. In this paper, at the first stage, the each part of the micro turbine cycle is modeled using thermodynamic laws. Next, with using the energetic and exergetic concepts and applying economic and environmental functions, the multi-objectives optimization of micro turbine in combined heat and power generation is performed. The design parameters of this cycle are compressor pressure ratio (rAC), compressor isentropic efficiency (?AC), GT isentropic efficiency (?GT), CC inlet temperature (T3), and turbine inlet temperature (T4). In the multi-objective optimization three objective functions, including CHP exergy efficiency, total cost rate of the system products, and CO2 emission of the whole plant, are considered. Theexergoenvironmental objective function is minimized whereas power plant exergy efficiency is maximized usinga Genetic algorithm. To have a good insight into this study, a sensitivity analysis of the result to the fuel cost is performed. The results show that at the lower exergetic efficiency, in which the weight of exergo-environmental objective is higher, the sensitivity of the optimal solutions to the fuel cost is much higher than the location of the Pareto Frontier with the lower weight of exergo-environmental objective. In addition, with increasing exergy efficiency, the purchase cost of equipment in the plant is increased as the cost rate of the plant increases.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamasb Pirkandi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Jokar ◽  
Mohammad Sameti ◽  
Alibakhsh Kasaeian ◽  
Fazel Kasaeian

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document