How and Why do We Disturb? Challenges and Possibilities of Pedagogy of Hope in Socially Just Pedagogies

Author(s):  
Peace Kiguwa
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-256
Author(s):  
Boyie S. Dlamini ◽  
P. E. Zwane

  Abstract Towards the end of 2019 the world experienced the Coronavirus disease (Covid 19) pandemic which affected operations of education systems. This reflective study examines how a lecturer and students built hope and  self-efficacy under Covid 19 educational contexts.  Self-efficacy–hopeful thinking model and Bernstein Framework were used in this study. The sample consisted of 515 students and 1 lecturer and it was sampled through purposeful stratified sampling. Data was collected through the lecturer’s self-reflection on his ability to build hope, self-efficacy to meet academic demands. The lecturer also observed students’ behaviours. The data was analysed through content analysis. Findings indicated that Covid 19 educational contexts mediated on students’ levels of  hope, acadmic investment and created false impression that University academic year had been lost. Some students developed low level of self-efficacy belief which forced them to approach educational problems without conviction and hopeful thinking. The findings indicated that lecturer’s behaviour towards students contributed to the improvement of a high sense of self-efficacy belief  and effort investment in their  work. The lecturer maintained hopefullness and confidence among students. The study concluded that educational processes under the uncertainties of Covid 19 were paradigm shift for the lecturer and students’ academic life. It provided opportunities to transform and reconstruct pedagogical discourses in relation to Covid 19 educational contexts. It may be recommended that lecturers and others within institutions may be urged to reflect on Covid 19 educational challenges and embrace them rather than avoid them.  Key words: Covid 19, Hope, Self-efficacy, Effort, Empathy


2018 ◽  
pp. 135-232
Author(s):  
Maria del Pilar O'Cadiz ◽  
Pia Lindquist Wong ◽  
Carlos Alberto Torres
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Maria del Pilar O'Cadiz ◽  
Pia Lindquist Wong ◽  
Carlos Alberto Torres

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-207
Author(s):  
Carly Smith

AbstractIn recounting the history of Cherbourg as an Aboriginal settlement, the Ration Shed Museum presents some traumatic narratives. It paints a picture of violent geographic and cultural dislocation, crude living conditions, forced labour and administrative oppression by infusing historical artefacts with the personal recollections of Cherbourg residents. The intent behind the Ration Shed Museum itself, however, is something quite different: its curators want to tell a story that speaks of hope for this community’s future, and to work towards some form of reconciliation. They do this by actively engaging with the ‘terrible gift’ of the past in the present, and by providing spaces for encounters that can lead to open discussions of difficult social issues and celebrations of contemporary Cherbourg life. This article draws on ethnographic interviews and observational data alongside the theoretical work of Roger I. Simon and Andrea Witcomb to describe how the Ration Shed Museum engages its community and visitors in a dual process of both understanding Cherbourg’s history and reframing traumatic narratives to enact a pedagogy of hope.


2019 ◽  
pp. 0739456X1984457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca S. Sartorio ◽  
Huw Thomas

This paper focuses on UK higher education (HE), but the circumstances it describes have parallels throughout the Global North. Its purpose is to offer hope to faculty and students despondent about the possibility of changing a HE system inimical to much-valued aspects of professional (including planning) education. This paper argues that a Freirean-inflected understanding of reflection can create conditions in which students and faculty have the possibilities of developing a shared, and radical, understanding of the shortcomings of current HE and identify real, if sometimes modest, opportunities for change in the short term.


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Lavia
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document