Environmental Impacts of Pond Ash Dumping at Kolaghat Thermal Power Plant (KTTP) – Physico-chemical Characterization of Pond Ash

2017 ◽  
pp. 153-170
Author(s):  
Prasenjit Ghosh ◽  
Sudha Goel
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Environmental Impacts ◽  
Thermal Power Plant ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Chemical Characterization ◽  
Pond Ash ◽  
Physico Chemical

scholarly journals Physico-chemical characterization of slag waste coming from GICC thermal power plant

2001 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Acosta ◽  
M Aineto ◽  
I Iglesias ◽  
M Romero ◽  
J.Ma. Rincón
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Thermal Power Plant ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Chemical Characterization ◽  
Physico Chemical ◽  
Slag Waste

Organic chemical characterization of size segregated particulate matter samples collected from a thermal power plant area

2020 ◽  
Vol 262 ◽  
pp. 114360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pelin Ertürk Ari ◽  
Akif Ari ◽  
Yetkin Dumanoğlu ◽  
Mustafa Odabasi ◽  
Eftade O. Gaga
Keyword(s):  
Particulate Matter ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Thermal Power Plant ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Chemical Characterization ◽  
Organic Chemical ◽  
Plant Area

Study on The Physico-Chemical and Microbial Profile of The Pond Water in Context of Pollution at Kolaghat Thermal Power Plant, West Bengal, India

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 174-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sambhunath Dinda ◽  
◽  
Harekrishna Jana ◽  
Soma Bhattacharya ◽  
Keshab Chandra mondal
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Thermal Power Plant ◽  
West Bengal ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Pond Water ◽  
Microbial Profile ◽  
Physico Chemical

Characterization of Tube Repair Weld in Thermal Power Plant Made of a 12%Cr Tempered Martensite Ferritic Steel

2016 ◽  
pp. 151-169
Author(s):  
Gordana M. Bakic ◽  
Milos B. Djukic ◽  
Bratislav Rajicic ◽  
Vera Sijacki Zeravcic ◽  
Aleksandar Maslarevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Thermal Power Plant ◽  
Ferritic Steel ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Tempered Martensite ◽  
Tube Repair

scholarly journals Characterization of Wet and Dry Deposition in the Downwind of Industrial Sources in a Dry Tropical Area

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 266-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raj K. Singh ◽  
Raj M. Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Dry Deposition ◽  
Thermal Power Plant ◽  
Wet Deposition ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Winter Season ◽  
Uttar Pradesh ◽  
Monthly Basis ◽  
Polluted Sites

An atmospheric deposition study was conducted in the downwind of Shaktinagar Thermal Power Plant (STPP), Renusagar Thermal Power Plant (RTPP), and Anpara Thermal Power Plant (ATPP), at Singrauli region, Uttar Pradesh (UP), India to characterize dry and wet deposition in relation to different pollution loading. During the study period, dry and wet depositions and levels of gaseous pollutants (SO2 and NO2) were estimated across the sites. Dry deposition was collected on a monthly basis and wet deposition on an event basis. Depositions were analyzed for pH, nitrate (NO3�), ammonium (NH4+), and sulphate (SO42�) contents. Dry deposition rate both collected as clearfall and throughfall varied between 0.15 to 2.28 and 0.33 to 3.48 g m�2 day�1, respectively, at control and maximally polluted sites. The pH of dry deposition varied from 5.81 to 6.89 during winter and 6.09 to 7.02 during summer across the sites. During the rainy season, the mean pH of clear wet deposition varied from 6.56 to 7.04 and throughfall varied from 6.81 to 7.22. The concentrations of NO2 and SO2 pollutants were highest during the winter season. Mean SO2 concentrations varied from 18 to 75 �g m�3 at control and differently polluted sites during the winter season. The variation in NO2 concentrations did not show a pattern similar to that of SO2. The highest NO2 concentration during the winter season was 50 �g m�3, observed near RTPP. NO2 concentration did not show much variation among different sites, suggesting that the sources of NO2 emission are evenly distributed along the sites. The concentrations of NH4+, NO3�, and SO42� ions in dry deposition were found to be higher in summer as compared to the winter season. In dry deposition (clearfall) the concentrations of NH4+, NO3�, and SO42� varied from 0.13 to 1.0, 0.81 to 1.95, and 0.82 to 3.27 mg l�1, respectively, during winter. In wet deposition (clearfall), the above varied from 0.14 to 0.74, 0.81 to 1.82, and 0.67 to 2.70 mg l�1, respectively. The study clearly showed that both dry and wet depositions varied between the sites and season, suggesting significant impact of industrial activities in modifying the atmospheric input. The nonacidic deposition suggests that there is no threat of acidification of the receiving ecosystem at present.

Characterization of coal and fly ash (generated) at coal based thermal power plant

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 1406-1411
Author(s):  
Krishna Rawat ◽  
Amit Kumar Yadav
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Thermal Power Plant ◽  
Thermal Power

scholarly journals Characterization of ash pond ashes from 3rd thermal power plant by SEM/EDX and XRD methods

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 61-65
Author(s):  
A Minjigmaa ◽  
Ts Zolzaya ◽  
E Bayanjargal ◽  
B Davaabal ◽  
J Temuujin
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Composition ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Thermal Power Plant ◽  
Coal Combustion ◽  
Thermal Power ◽  
Mineralogical Composition ◽  
Composition Changes ◽  
By Products ◽  
Ash Pond

  Coal combustion by products from ash pond of 3rdthermal power plant of Ulaanbaatar city have been collected in 2010 and 2013 years. The ash samples have been characterized by XRD, XRF and SEM-EDX methods in order to evaluate their chemical and mineralogical composition changes with disposed times. The mineralogical composition of ash varies with time though the chemical composition of the ashes were close each other. Possibly, inefficient operating condition of the TPS shows influence on the mineralogical composition.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5564/mjc.v14i0.201Mongolian Journal of Chemistry 14 (40), 2013, p61-65

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document