EBSD characterisation of grain size distribution and grain sub-structures for ferritic steel weld metals

Microstructural characterisation of engineering materials is required for understanding the relationships between microstructure and mechanical properties. Conventionally grain size is measured from grain boundary maps obtained using optical or electron microscopy. This paper implements EBSD-based linear intercept measurement of spatial grain size variation for ferritic steel weld metals, making analysis flexible and robust. While grain size has been shown to correlate with the strength of the material according to the Hall–Petch relationship, similar grain sizes in weld metals with different phase volume fractions can have significantly different mechanical properties. Furthermore, the solidification of the weld pool induces the formation of grain sub-structures that can alter mechanical properties. The recently developed domain misorientation approach is used in this study to provide a more comprehensive characterisation of the grain sub-structures for ferritic steel weld metals. The studied weld metals consist of varying mixtures of primary ferrite, acicular ferrite, and bainite/martensite, with large differences observed in hardness, grain size, grain morphology, and dislocation cell size. For the studied weld metals, the average dislocation cell size varied between 0.68 and 1.41 µm, with bainitic/martensitic weld metals showing the smallest sub-structures and primary ferrite the largest. In contrast, the volume-weighted average grain size was largest for the bainitic/martensitic weld metal. Results indicate that a Hall–Petch-type relationship exists between hardness and average dislocation cell size and that it partially corrects the significantly different grain size—hardness relationship observed for ferritic and bainitic/martensitic weld metals. The methods and datasets are provided as open access.

About the Memory of Transformation-Induced Plasticity in 35NCD16 Carbon Steel Subjected to Various Thermomechanical Histories

This study deals with Transformation-Induced Plasticity (TRIP) observed in the martensitic transformation of 35NCD16 ferritic steel. In this study, TRIP tests were carried out for two different cases: First, after only free dilatometric (FD) tests, which is used as the reference test for the considered applied stress; second, with TRIP tests being performed similarly to the first case (same thermal cycle, same applied stress) but with pre-thermomechanical loading histories applied. Such histories may be FD tests, TRIP tests, elastoplastic history, etc. The comparison between the results of TRIP test (a) and TRIP test (b) indicates if TRIP holds the memory of the applied loading histories. The current obtained results tell us that TRIP does not hold any significant memory. During the martensite à austenite transformation, the material may present recovery from strain hardening. Waiting for more details about the physical phenomena responsible for the absence of TRIP memory, one can point out the importance of this result as it enables one to use the same specimen for several TRIP tests. However, this result must be validated using other combinations of loading histories (such as multiaxial and cyclic, among others).