Learning Hybrid Process Models from Events

Author(s):  
Wil M. P. van der Aalst ◽  
Riccardo De Masellis ◽  
Chiara Di Francescomarino ◽  
Chiara Ghidini
2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 694-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Kahrs ◽  
W. Marquardt

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 368-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Cheng ◽  
Boudewijn F. van Dongen ◽  
Wil M.P. van der Aalst

Author(s):  
Amine Abbad Andaloussi ◽  
Francesca Zerbato ◽  
Andrea Burattin ◽  
Tijs Slaats ◽  
Thomas T. Hildebrandt ◽  
...  

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 704
Author(s):  
Fenila Francis-Xavier ◽  
Fabian Kubannek ◽  
René Schenkendorf

Chemical process engineering and machine learning are merging rapidly, and hybrid process models have shown promising results in process analysis and process design. However, uncertainties in first-principles process models have an adverse effect on extrapolations and inferences based on hybrid process models. Parameter sensitivities are an essential tool to understand better the underlying uncertainty propagation and hybrid system identification challenges. Still, standard parameter sensitivity concepts may fail to address comprehensive parameter uncertainty problems, i.e., deep uncertainty with aleatoric and epistemic contributions. This work shows a highly effective and reproducible sampling strategy to calculate simulation uncertainties and global parameter sensitivities for hybrid process models under deep uncertainty. We demonstrate the workflow with two electrochemical synthesis simulation studies, including the synthesis of furfuryl alcohol and 4-aminophenol. Compared with Monte Carlo reference simulations, the CPU-time was significantly reduced. The general findings of the hybrid model sensitivity studies under deep uncertainty are twofold. First, epistemic uncertainty has a significant effect on uncertainty analysis. Second, the predicted parameter sensitivities of the hybrid process models add value to the interpretation and analysis of the hybrid models themselves but are not suitable for predicting the real process/full first-principles process model’s sensitivities.


2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidong Yang ◽  
Elaine Martin ◽  
Julian Morris

Author(s):  
Tijs Slaats ◽  
Dennis M. M. Schunselaar ◽  
Fabrizio M. Maggi ◽  
Hajo A. Reijers

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Ji Ma

AbstractGiven the many types of suboptimality in perception, I ask how one should test for multiple forms of suboptimality at the same time – or, more generally, how one should compare process models that can differ in any or all of the multiple components. In analogy to factorial experimental design, I advocate for factorial model comparison.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document