Case Study: Research Ethics Committee at King Hussein Cancer Center, Jordan

Author(s):  
Maysa Al-Hussaini
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siswanto Siswanto ◽  
Subandi Subandi ◽  
ira paramastri

The method applied is a case study, supported by three participants, they are all women who have experienced possession disorder twice for minimal. Data collection obtained by interviewing the participants and participant’s friend or family using semi-structured interview followed by SSCT test. All participants have obtained informed consent and expressed their willingness to become participants.<p></p> This study also received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology, Gadjah Mada University No. 4204/SD/PL.03.01/XI/ 2017


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siswanto Siswanto ◽  
Subandi Subandi ◽  
ira paramastri

The method applied is a case study, supported by three participants, they are all women who have experienced possession disorder twice for minimal. Data collection obtained by interviewing the participants and participant’s friend or family using semi-structured interview followed by SSCT test. All participants have obtained informed consent and expressed their willingness to become participants.<p></p> This study also received approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology, Gadjah Mada University No. 4204/SD/PL.03.01/XI/ 2017


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 541-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Ssali ◽  
Fiona Poland ◽  
Janet Seeley

Abstract Background We investigated how relevant and responsive scientists and research ethics committee (REC) members considered the research protocol review processes for health research practice in Uganda. Methods Interviews were conducted with five scientists and five REC members. Data were analysed thematically. Results How much to compensate for time, the amount of study information shared with volunteers and sample storage for future unknown research were areas of concern for REC members. Delays in getting feedback concerned scientists. Conclusions Researchers and REC members need to hold regular discussions to ensure the review process is relevant and responsive.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Tetnowski

Qualitative case study research can be a valuable tool for answering complex, real-world questions. This method is often misunderstood or neglected due to a lack of understanding by researchers and reviewers. This tutorial defines the characteristics of qualitative case study research and its application to a broader understanding of stuttering that cannot be defined through other methodologies. This article will describe ways that data can be collected and analyzed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicki L. Plano Clark ◽  
◽  
Lori A. Foote ◽  
Janet B. Walton ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Annabelle Cumyn ◽  
Roxanne Dault ◽  
Adrien Barton ◽  
Anne-Marie Cloutier ◽  
Jean-François Ethier

A survey was conducted to assess citizens, research ethics committee members, and researchers’ attitude toward information and consent for the secondary use of health data for research within learning health systems (LHSs). Results show that the reuse of health data for research to advance knowledge and improve care is valued by all parties; consent regarding health data reuse for research has fundamental importance particularly to citizens; and all respondents deemed important the existence of a secure website to support the information and consent processes. This survey was part of a larger project that aims at exploring public perspectives on alternate approaches to the current consent models for health data reuse to take into consideration the unique features of LHSs. The revised model will need to ensure that citizens are given the opportunity to be better informed about upcoming research and have their say, when possible, in the use of their data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document