How Reliable Is Sentiment Analysis? A Multi-domain Empirical Investigation

Cross-Domain Sentiment Analysis: An Empirical Investigation

2016 IEEE 17th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI) ◽

10.1109/iri.2016.28 ◽

2016 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Brian Heredia ◽

Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar ◽

Joseph Prusa ◽

Michael Crawford

Keyword(s):

Sentiment Analysis ◽

Empirical Investigation ◽

Cross Domain

Download Full-text

ECNU at SemEval-2016 Task 4: An Empirical Investigation of Traditional NLP Features and Word Embedding Features for Sentence-level and Topic-level Sentiment Analysis in Twitter

10.18653/v1/s16-1040 ◽

2016 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Yunxiao Zhou ◽

Zhihua Zhang ◽

Man Lan

Keyword(s):

Sentiment Analysis ◽

Empirical Investigation ◽

Word Embedding ◽

Sentence Level

Download Full-text

An Empirical Investigation of Sentiment Analysis of the Bug Tracking Process in Libre Office Open Source Software

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology - Open Source Systems ◽

10.1007/978-3-030-47240-5_4 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 36-46

Author(s):

Apostolos Kritikos ◽

Theodoros Venetis ◽

Ioannis Stamelos

Keyword(s):

Sentiment Analysis ◽

Open Source ◽

Open Source Software ◽

Empirical Investigation ◽

Tracking Process ◽

Bug Tracking

Download Full-text

Self-Esteem and the SCII: Empirical Investigation of a Clinical Observation

Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance ◽

10.1080/00256307.1979.12022188 ◽

1979 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 82-86

Author(s):

Karen Friedel ◽

Jo-Ida Hansen ◽

Thomas J. Hummel ◽

Warren F. Shaffer

Keyword(s):

Empirical Investigation ◽

Clinical Observation ◽

Self Esteem

Download Full-text

Self-Injurious Behavior vs. Nonsuicidal Self-Injury

Crisis ◽

10.1027/0227-5910/a000127 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 33 (2) ◽

pp. 106-112 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Christopher M. Bloom ◽

Shareen Holly ◽

Adam M. P. Miller

Keyword(s):

Positive Reinforcement ◽

Empirical Investigation ◽

High Stress ◽

Animal Research ◽

Stress Conditions ◽

Human Populations ◽

Pharmacological Interventions ◽

Self Injury ◽

Cns Stimulant ◽

Nonsuicidal Self Injury

Background: Historically, the field of self-injury has distinguished between the behaviors exhibited among individuals with a developmental disability (self-injurious behaviors; SIB) and those present within a normative population (nonsuicidal self-injury; NSSI),which typically result as a response to perceived stress. More recently, however, conclusions about NSSI have been drawn from lines of animal research aimed at examining the neurobiological mechanisms of SIB. Despite some functional similarity between SIB and NSSI, no empirical investigation has provided precedent for the application of SIB-targeted animal research as justification for pharmacological interventions in populations demonstrating NSSI. Aims: The present study examined this question directly, by simulating an animal model of SIB in rodents injected with pemoline and systematically manipulating stress conditions in order to monitor rates of self-injury. Methods: Sham controls and experimental animals injected with pemoline (200 mg/kg) were assigned to either a low stress (discriminated positive reinforcement) or high stress (discriminated avoidance) group and compared on the dependent measures of self-inflicted injury prevalence and severity. Results: The manipulation of stress conditions did not impact the rate of self-injury demonstrated by the rats. The results do not support a model of stress-induced SIB in rodents. Conclusions: Current findings provide evidence for caution in the development of pharmacotherapies of NSSI in human populations based on CNS stimulant models. Theoretical implications are discussed with respect to antecedent factors such as preinjury arousal level and environmental stress.

Download Full-text