The US Mental Health Care System’s Response to Intimate Partner Violence: A Call to Action

2021 ◽  
pp. 3175-3200
Author(s):  
Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling ◽  
Candice Selwyn ◽  
Emma Lathan ◽  
Mallory Schneider
2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 326-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mysore Narasimha Vranda ◽  
Channaveerachari Naveen Kumar ◽  
D. Muralidhar ◽  
N. Janardhana ◽  
P. T. Sivakumar

ABSTRACT Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV)/domestic violence is one of the significant public health problems, but little is known about the barriers to disclosure in tertiary care psychiatric settings. Methodology: One hundred women seeking inpatient or outpatient services at a tertiary care psychiatric setting were recruited for study using purposive sampling. A semi-structured interview was administered to collect the information from women with mental illness experiencing IPV to know about their help-seeking behaviors, reasons for disclosure/nondisclosure of IPV, perceived feelings experienced after reporting IPV, and help received from the mental health professionals (MHPs) following the disclosure of violence. Results: The data revealed that at the patient level, majority of the women chose to conceal their abuse from the mental health-care professionals, fearing retaliation from their partners if they get to know about the disclosure of violence. At the professional level, lack of privacy was another important barrier for nondisclosure where women reported that MHPs discussed the abuse in the presence of their violent partners. Conclusion: The findings of the study brought out the need for mandatory screening of violence and designing tailor-made multicomponent interventions for mental health care professionals at psychiatric setting in India.


Author(s):  
Anneliese E. Sorrentino ◽  
Katherine M. Iverson ◽  
Anaïs Tuepker ◽  
Gala True ◽  
Meagan Cusack ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin V. Rhodes ◽  
Theodore J. Iwashyna

AbstractThe mental health correlates of male aggression or violence against an intimate partner (IPV) are examined using exploratory cluster analysis for 81 men who self-reported risk factors for IPV perpetration on a computer-based health risk assessment. Men disclosing IPV perpetration could be meaningfully subdivided into two different clusters: a high pathology/high violence cluster, and lower pathology/low violence cluster. These groups appear to perpetrate intimate partner violence in differing psychoemotional contexts and could be robustly identified using multiple distinct analytic methods. If men who self-disclose IPV in a health care setting can be meaningfully subdivided based on mental health symptoms and level of violence, it lends support for potential new targeted approaches to preventing partner violence perpetration by both women and men.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document