C1-Ring Osteosynthesis for Unstable, Jefferson Burst Fractures

2019 ◽  
pp. 201-206
Author(s):  
Jason L. Pittman ◽  
Richard J. Bransford
Keyword(s):  
Burst Fractures

Controversies in Managing of Thoracic-Lumbar Upper Burst Fractures

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahat Edison Sitorus
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Surgical Decompression ◽  
Neurologic Deficit ◽  
Retroperitoneal Approach ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Lateral Fixation

Upper burst fracture of Th12-L1 has unique anatomy because it contains lower spinal cord, medullary cone, and diaphragm which separates between the thoracic and lumbar spine.The presence or absence of neurologic deficit is the single most important factor in the decision making. The presence of profound but incomplete neural deficit in association with canal compromise represents an urgent indication of surgical decompression. Antero-lateral direct decompression with trans-thoracic trans-pleural–retroperitoneal approach given the proximity the cord and conus is the most effective method, with inter-vertebral instrumentation with or without lateral fixation or posterior instrumentation.

Experimental modeling of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine

TRAUMA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-52
Author(s):  
V.A. Radchenko ◽  
K.A. Popsuyshapka ◽  
M.Yu. Karpinsky ◽  
E.D. Karpinska ◽  
S.A. Teslenko
Keyword(s):  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Experimental Modeling ◽  
Burst Fractures

Functional Outcomes of Nerve Root Sparing Posterior Corpectomy in Lumbar Vertebral Burst Fractures

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822098412
Author(s):  
Abhinandan Reddy Mallepally ◽  
Nandan Marathe ◽  
Abhinav Kumar Shrivastava ◽  
Vikas Tandon ◽  
Harvinder Singh Chhabra
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Height Loss ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
The Difference

Study Design: Retrospective observational. Objectives: This study aimed to document the safety and efficacy of lumbar corpectomy with reconstruction of anterior column through posterior-only approach in complete burst fractures. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed complete lumbar burst fractures treated with corpectomy through posterior only approach between 2014 and 2018. Clinical and intraoperative data including pre and post-operative neurology as per the ISNCSCI grade, VAS score, operative time, blood loss and radiological parameters, including pre and post-surgery kyphosis, height loss and canal compromise was assessed. Results: A total of 45 patients, with a mean age of 38.89 and a TLICS score 5 or more were analyzed. Preoperative VAS was 7-10. Mean operating time was 219.56 ± 30.15 minutes. Mean blood loss was 1280 ± 224.21 ml. 23 patients underwent short segment fixation and 22 underwent long segment fixation. There was no deterioration in post-operative neurological status in any patient. At follow-up, the VAS score was in the range of 1-3. The difference in preoperative kyphosis and immediate post-operative deformity correction, preoperative loss of height in vertebra and immediate post-operative correction in height were significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The posterior-only approach is safe, efficient, and provides rigid posterior stabilization, 360° neural decompression, and anterior reconstruction without the need for the anterior approach and its possible approach-related morbidity. We achieved good results with an all posterior approach in 45 patients of lumbar burst fracture (LBF) which is the largest series of this nature.

scholarly journals Percutaneous augmented instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 850-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nimrod Rahamimov ◽  
Hani Mulla ◽  
Adi Shani ◽  
Shay Freiman
Keyword(s):  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Burst Fractures

scholarly journals Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: extended follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing orthosis versus no orthosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer C. Urquhart ◽  
Osama A. Alrehaili ◽  
Charles G. Fisher ◽  
Alyssa Fleming ◽  
Parham Rasoulinejad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Average Treatment Effect ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures ◽  
Treatment Comparison ◽  
Average Treatment ◽  
Burst Fractures ◽  
Time Weighted Average

OBJECTIVEA multicenter, prospective, randomized equivalence trial comparing a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) to no orthosis (NO) in the treatment of acute AO Type A3 thoracolumbar burst fractures was recently conducted and demonstrated that the two treatments following an otherwise similar management protocol are equivalent at 3 months postinjury. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether there was a difference in long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes between the patients treated with and those treated without a TLSO. Here, the authors present the 5- to 10-year outcomes (mean follow-up 7.9 ± 1.1 years) of the patients at a single site from the original multicenter trial.METHODSBetween July 2002 and January 2009, a total of 96 subjects were enrolled in the primary trial and randomized to two groups: TLSO or NO. Subjects were enrolled if they had an AO Type A3 burst fracture between T-10 and L-3 within the previous 72 hours, kyphotic deformity < 35°, no neurological deficit, and an age of 16–60 years old. The present study represents a subset of those patients: 16 in the TLSO group and 20 in the NO group. The primary outcome measure was the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) score at the last 5- to 10-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included kyphosis, satisfaction, the Numeric Rating Scale for back pain, and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental and Physical Component Summary (MCS and PCS) scores. In the original study, outcome measures were administered at admission and 2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 and 2 years after injury; in the present extended follow-up study, the outcome measures were administered 5–10 years postinjury. Treatment comparison between patients in the TLSO group and those in the NO group was performed at the latest available follow-up, and the time-weighted average treatment effect was determined using a mixed-effects model of longitudinal regression for repeated measures averaged over all time periods. Missing data were assumed to be missing at random and were replaced with a set of plausible values derived using a multiple imputation procedure.RESULTSThe RMDQ score at 5–10 years postinjury was 3.6 ± 0.9 (mean ± SE) for the TLSO group and 4.8 ± 1.5 for the NO group (p = 0.486, 95% CI −2.3 to 4.8). Average kyphosis was 18.3° ± 2.2° for the TLSO group and 18.6° ± 3.8° for the NO group (p = 0.934, 95% CI −7.8 to 8.5). No differences were found between the NO and TLSO groups with time-weighted average treatment effects for RMDQ 1.9 (95% CI −1.5 to 5.2), for PCS −2.5 (95% CI −7.9 to 3.0), for MCS −1.2 (95% CI −6.7 to 4.2) and for average pain 0.9 (95% CI −0.5 to 2.2).CONCLUSIONSCompared with patients treated with a TLSO, patients treated using early mobilization without orthosis maintain similar pain relief and improvement in function for 5–10 years.

Percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic burst fractures

2009 ◽  
Vol 151 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Jae Shin ◽  
Dong Kyu Chin ◽  
Young Sul Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty ◽  
Burst Fractures
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document