Methods of Criteria Importance Theory and Their Software Implementation

The article proposes an algorithm for solving a linear programming problem (LPP) based on the use of its representation in the form of an antagonistic matrix game and the subsequent solution of the game by an iterative method. The algorithm is implemented as a computer program. The rate of convergence of the estimates of the solution to the actual value with the required accuracy has been studied. The software implementation shows a high speed of obtaining the LPP solution with acceptable accuracy in fractions or units of seconds. This allows the use algorithm in embedded systems for optimal control.

Download Full-text

УНИФИЦИРОВАННАЯ РЕКОНФИГУРИРУЕМАЯ СХЕМА КОММУТАЦИИ БПФ

Nanoindustry Russia ◽

10.22184/1993-8578.2020.13.3s.114.118 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 96 (3s) ◽

pp. 114-118

Author(s):

П.С. Поперечный ◽

И.Ю. Поперечная

Keyword(s):

Software Implementation ◽

Communication Scheme ◽

Additional Hardware

Предложен способ вычисления БПФ с унифицированной схемой коммутации от стадии к стадии. Представлено итеративное выражение для аппаратной или программной реализации схемы вычисления. Для предложенных схем описана возможность реконфигурирования для вычисления БПФ различного числа отсчетов, при этом поворотные множители остаются прежними и нет необходимости делать их переменными. The article offers a method for FFT calculation by means of unified communication scheme stage-by-stage. There is an iterating equation for hardware and software implementation. Also, it provides the reconfiguration of schemes by different samples number. The rotating multipliers are the same like in non-reconfigurable (fixed) communication scheme. So, the offered approach does not require additional hardware or software resources.

Download Full-text

Argumentation theory: competition between modern research approaches

Russian Foundation for Basic Research Journal Humanities and social sciences ◽

10.22204/2587-8956-2018-090-01-77-87 ◽

2018 ◽

pp. 77-87

Author(s):

Анатолий Мигунов ◽

Anatoliy Migunov ◽

Елена Лисанюк ◽

Elena Lisanyuk

Keyword(s):

Social Life ◽

Critical Discussion ◽

Procedural Semantics ◽

Social Success ◽

Large Structures ◽

Criteria Importance ◽

Practical Argumentation ◽

Argumentative Structure ◽

Theory Competition

To overcome the crisis in the sphere of argumentation studies, the project proposes a logical-cognitive concept of argumentation which is a compound formalized theory that includes formalisms for modeling argumentation of different types, a relevant conceptual framework and a methodology for the use of scientific research in the practice. Three types of argumentation are defined: theoretical (two types) and practical. Theoretical argumentation is a critical discussion of the agents’ knowledge and opinions about facts aimed to substantiate a certain view or to change it – i.e. persuasion. Practical argumentation is a critical discussion of opinions about actions which includes, in addition to the statements about knowledge and opinions, statements of a non-descriptive nature about the agents’ values and intentions to adhere to a certain line of behavior. The study of argumentation needs to focus on the large structures that reflect specifics of the criticism and defense of the positions of the parties. An atom unit of such study is the argument as a statement of reason, while its molecular elements are the argumentative structure of a dispute (frame), a multitude of arguments that express the parties’ positions, a multitude of the agents’ knowledge and opinions that act as the bases for the formation of positions, lines of behavior, etc. Within the framework of this trend, both indefeasible (deductive) and defeasible argumentations can be studied. The argumentation effectiveness can be assessed based on the procedural semantics and using analogues of such logical notions as consistency and completeness. Modern approaches to the argumentation, including those claiming the compound status, can be classified using two methods: based on the substantive and practical criteria. Importance of the research outcomes amounts to the theoretical and methodological role of the new conception of argumentation and the general “umbrella” term argumentation that allows systematizing the manifold research and educational approaches and concepts in this field and is associated with communicative nature of modern social life where efficiency and social success rely on argumentative and narrative competences.

Download Full-text