Does ’Notice’ Prompt Noticing? Raising Awareness in Language Learning with an Open Learner Model

Author(s):  
Gheida Shahrour ◽  
Susan Bull
ReCALL ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Bull ◽  
Barbara Wasson

AbstractThis paper introduces an open learner model approach to learning analytics to combine the variety of data available from the range of applications and technologies in language learning, for visualisation of language learning competences to learners and teachers in the European language context. Specific examples are provided as illustrations (Facebook, Second Life and mobile assisted language learning (MALL)), though the approach is a general one. We describe the Next-TELL open learner model as an exemplar that can encompass a range of data from a variety of technologies and activities, and as a competence-focussed visual analytics tool that can be readily used inside and outside the classroom.The Next-TELL open learner model offers several visualisations for learners and teachers to explore the learner’s current competences, which can be selected according to user preferences or the purpose of viewing the learning data. The selection of visualisations means that the open learner model is appropriate for school, university and other learning contexts. Viewing this data can help students to reflect on and monitor their learning, and can support teachers’ decision-making during classroom activities or later, in their planning of subsequent sessions. As an example, we outline the use of the Next-TELL open learner model in a school in Norway.


Author(s):  
Susan Bull ◽  
Michael Kickmeier-Rust ◽  
Gerhilde Meissl-Egghart ◽  
Matthew D. Johnson ◽  
Barbara Wasson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marcelo Concário

This paper results from a classroom study with Radio/TV Studies undergraduates over a period of 16 weeks (60 hours) to investigate: (1) group cooperation/collaboration in the writing of two texts requiring online interaction; (2) students' comments about the language/strategies they practiced and learned; and the impact on their awareness of language and learning. Assessment of collaboration was based on the work of five groups. Comments about language learning/motivation/challenges were also expressed in a final presentation/portfolio. Interpretive analysis shows that labor sharing is preferred, that learning is perceived to be more systematic because of the records of feedback/correction, and that students prefer to work mostly in class, which can be frustrating for advocates of autonomy in advanced language learning.


2012 ◽  
pp. 310-321
Author(s):  
Nahid Yarahmadzehi ◽  
Elham Bazleh

Classroom-based, teacher-directed language learning has been dominant in language teaching and learning for decades; however, the notion of autonomy is not novel to language teachers. Since the publication of Holec’s book, Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning (1981), autonomy in language learning has been a significant issue for discussion in relation to language learning practices and language teaching principles. Many ESL researchers have turned their attention to learner autonomy in classroom settings; however, learner autonomy in the Iranian context within self-access settings, classroom settings, and school curriculum has not been adequately addressed in the literature. To fill the research gap mentioned above, the present study aims to determine: 1. if Betts’s Autonomous Learner Model (Betts & Kercher, 1999) has any significant effect in terms of students’ self-directed learning readiness, and 2. if Betts’s Autonomous Learner Model has any significant effect on students’ English language proficiency. Adopting a quasi-experimental design, the study involved a comparison between the experimental and the control group. Two instruments were used: Gugliemino’s (1977) Self-Directed Learning Readiness Scale (SDLRS); and standardized TOEFL test. 30 students (group A) were taught English based on a pedagogical model, which blended Betts’s ALM with classroom instruction and 30 students (group B) were taught through a traditional teacher-directed method. Finally, after six months of treatment, TOEFL test and SDLRS test were administered as the post-test and the results were analyzed by means of SPSS software. The results showed that ALM can work with Iranian students as evidenced by generally average performance on SDLRS and TOEFL post-tests.


1991 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian Tyacke

Faced with the inadequacies of models of language teaching, researchers and practitioners have moved to models of language learning. Within this framework, many of us have attempted to characterize student learning styles and strategies. It is assumed that raising awareness of such styles and strategies will facilitate language development, by providing a basis on which a principled choice of activities can be made, and encouraging learners to take on more "ownership" of the process. This article argues that, even though we may not be able to change an individual's basic cognitive style, we may be able to make the learning process more transparent. It also suggests that strategy training can be useful, providing principles for such training, and practical suggestions for teacher training courses and classroom practice. Finally it proposes that syllabus design should take individual differences into account, and that such differences have to be carefully diagnosed and analyzed by the classroom teacher in collaboration with the learner.


Author(s):  
Susan Bull ◽  
Matthew. D. Johnson ◽  
Mohammad Alotaibi ◽  
Will Byrne ◽  
Gabi Cierniak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document