Panel Discussion Managing Digital Identities – Challenges and Opportunities

Author(s):  
Günther Pernul ◽  
Marco Casassa Mont ◽  
Eduardo B. Fernandez ◽  
Socrates Katsikas ◽  
Alfred Kobsa ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 195 (1) ◽  
pp. 170-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard P. Forman ◽  
Marcia C. Javitt ◽  
Barbara Monsees ◽  
David B. Larson ◽  
Alexander Norbash ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Thow ◽  
A Garde ◽  
M Mabhala ◽  
R Smith ◽  
P Kingston ◽  
...  

Abstract There is widespread recognition that trade and investment agreements (TIAs) can affect health services, access to medicines, NCD prevention (particularly related to tobacco, alcohol and unhealthy food) and health systems structures. In addition, these binding international economic agreements can constrain the policy space available for innovative, evidence-based health policymaking. Although TIAs can have positive outcomes for employment and economic growth, these benefits are only likely to accrue when governments are pro-active in implementing complementary policies to mitigate impacts on other sectors and to address potential inequalities arising. The aim of this panel session is to examine the ways in which TIAs can be designed to achieve economic goals while also protecting public health, and identify complementary policy measures that may be needed as well as strategies for strategic policy engagement. This panel will be hosted by the UK-PRP PETRA Network (Prevention of noncommunicable disease using trade agreements). The UK will be negotiating a range of new TIAs over the coming years, representing a window of opportunity for strategic engagement with policymakers regarding how public health can be protected and promoted within these agreements. There is an emerging global body of evidence regarding how consideration of health can be integrated into TIAs, both textually and through strategic engagement with policymakers before and during the negotiation phase. Experience to date indicates common global challenges and opportunities for health and trade, as well as significant potential for cross country learning regarding trade and health. The panel discussion will use the UK experience as a springboard to address these global issues.


2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (4II) ◽  
pp. 759-759
Author(s):  
Abrar Ahmad Khan

Reformed GST as you know is a law which we have introduced in National Assembly. Its main features are that we are proposing minimum exemptions because our present law gives lot of exemptions. The second basic thing is about zero rating. Presently we have zero rated even domestic supplies for five exports sectors and even others sectors also. We are restricting zero rating for exports only and for domestic supplies it will be taxable. The third major thing is that we are increasing registration threshold from Rs 5 million to Rs 7.5 million. This proposal will spare smaller tax payers from incurring the compliance cost related to keeping of records and filing of returns. Then the fourth major change in the new law is that buyers have to give their CNIC or NTN to the sellers. This provision will help in keeping smaller taxpayer outside tax net and bringing bigger ones in tax net. Then there are lot of distortions in the existing law in the form of special schemes and fixed tax schemes. These schemes will not be part of the new law. The new law has been discussed in Senate’s Finance Committee where there have been objections about certain provisions which have been considered as very harsh and government has promised to consider softening them.


2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ticky Fullerton ◽  
Matt Canavan ◽  
Nathan Fay ◽  
Rod Sims ◽  
Kevin Gallagher ◽  
...  

There is not an abstract available for this discussion. To view the video, click the link on the right.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-190
Author(s):  
Beverly Dowdy ◽  
David Crotty ◽  
Beth Bernhardt ◽  
Paige Hall Smith ◽  
Jan Mayo

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Gordon ◽  
Adam Greiner ◽  
Mark J. Kohlbeck ◽  
Steven Lin ◽  
Hollis Skaife

SYNOPSIS: A concurrent session at the 2011 American Accounting Association Annual Meeting featured the panel discussion “Results, Challenges, and Opportunities in Cross-Country Accounting Research.” The panelists summarized major contributions from prior research in international settings, factors a researcher should consider when motivating and designing cross-country studies, and topical areas that could potentially contribute to future international accounting research. This paper summarizes the panelists' prepared remarks, develops a framework for designing cross-country research projects, and provides illustrations of the framework.


2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
José López

This article presents a reflection on the challenges and opportunities associated with the now ubiquitous requests inviting social scientists to participate in ELSI (Ethical, Legal and Social Implications) type frameworks, attached to large science projects such as nanotechnoscience. It elaborates on some ideas presented in a panel discussion titled "On the Social and Ethical Impacts of Nanotechnology" in Winnipeg at the Canadian Sociological and Anthropological Association (CSAA) annual meeting in the spring of 2004. This was the first panel session devoted to nanotechnology in the CSAA. I begin by briefly developing some key ideas from the field of social studies of science in order to draw attention to the fact that scientific activity has always required the mobilisation of a variety of social, political, cultural and economic resources. Nanotechnoscience is no different. What is distinctive, however, is the perceived need to enrol the social sciences in ELSI-type programs as a way securing legitimacy and to contribute to the overall success of these initiatives. I suggest that it is important to attend to the types of discursive spaces and objects of knowledge that are opened up to the social sciences in these ELSI frameworks. In light of work in science studies, the notion that the social implications of the technology can be grasped by simply projecting current trends into the future has to be problematised and treated with great care. I conclude by suggesting that sociology and anthropology's most important contribution might lie not in contributing to the illusion of predictability and control, which nanotechnoscience is currently attempting to foster as a way of securing social, political, ethical and economic legitimacy for its endeavour, but in short-circuiting these processes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document