Financial Return Distributions

Author(s):  
Matthias Fischer
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung Xuan Do ◽  
Robert Darren Brooks ◽  
Sirimon Treepongkaruna ◽  
Eliza Wu

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Fischer ◽  
Klaus Herrmann

We introduce two new skewed and leptokurtic distributions derived from the hyperbolic secant distribution and from Vaughan (2002)’s generalized hyperbolic distribution by use of the sinh-arcsinh transformation introduced in Jones and Pewsey (2009). Properties of these new distribution are given. Their flexibility for modeling financial return data is comparable to that of their most advanced peers. Contrary to the latter for both distributions a closed-form solution for the density, cumulative distribution and quantile function can be given.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 190-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung Xuan Do ◽  
Robert Brooks ◽  
Sirimon Treepongkaruna ◽  
Eliza Wu

Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 884
Author(s):  
Marcin Wątorek ◽  
Jarosław Kwapień ◽  
Stanisław Drożdż

We analyze the price return distributions of currency exchange rates, cryptocurrencies, and contracts for differences (CFDs) representing stock indices, stock shares, and commodities. Based on recent data from the years 2017–2020, we model tails of the return distributions at different time scales by using power-law, stretched exponential, and q-Gaussian functions. We focus on the fitted function parameters and how they change over the years by comparing our results with those from earlier studies and find that, on the time horizons of up to a few minutes, the so-called “inverse-cubic power-law” still constitutes an appropriate global reference. However, we no longer observe the hypothesized universal constant acceleration of the market time flow that was manifested before in an ever faster convergence of empirical return distributions towards the normal distribution. Our results do not exclude such a scenario but, rather, suggest that some other short-term processes related to a current market situation alter market dynamics and may mask this scenario. Real market dynamics is associated with a continuous alternation of different regimes with different statistical properties. An example is the COVID-19 pandemic outburst, which had an enormous yet short-time impact on financial markets. We also point out that two factors—speed of the market time flow and the asset cross-correlation magnitude—while related (the larger the speed, the larger the cross-correlations on a given time scale), act in opposite directions with regard to the return distribution tails, which can affect the expected distribution convergence to the normal distribution.


Author(s):  
R. Horrell ◽  
A.K. Metherell ◽  
S. Ford ◽  
C. Doscher

Over two million tonnes of fertiliser are applied to New Zealand pastures and crops annually and there is an increasing desire by farmers to ensure that the best possible economic return is gained from this investment. Spreading distribution measurements undertaken by Lincoln Ventures Ltd (LVL) have identified large variations in the evenness of fertiliser application by spreading machines which could lead to a failure to achieve optimum potential in some crop yields and to significant associated economic losses. To quantify these losses, a study was undertaken to calculate the effect of uneven fertiliser application on crop yield. From LVL's spreader database, spread patterns from many machines were categorised by spread pattern type and by coefficient of variation (CV). These patterns were then used to calculate yield losses when they were combined with the response data from five representative cropping and pastoral situations. Nitrogen fertiliser on ryegrass seed crops shows significant production losses at a spread pattern CV between 30% and 40%. For P and S on pasture, the cumulative effect of uneven spreading accrues, until there is significant economic loss occurring by year 3 for both the Waikato dairy and Southland sheep and beef systems at CV values between 30% and 40%. For nitrogen on pasture, significant loss in a dairy system occurs at a CV of approximately 40% whereas for a sheep and beef system it is at a CV of 50%, where the financial return from nitrogen application has been calculated at the average gross revenue of the farming system. The conclusion of this study is that the current Spreadmark standards are a satisfactory basis for defining the evenness requirements of fertiliser applications in most circumstances. On the basis of Spreadmark testing to date, more than 50% of the national commercial spreading fleet fails to meet the standard for nitrogenous fertilisers and 40% fails to meet the standard for phosphatic fertilisers.Keywords: aerial spreading, crop response, economic loss, fertiliser, ground spreading, striping, uneven application, uneven spreading, yield loss


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document