Defining New Structural and Mobile Support to Improve Hospital Facilities Access and Usability

Author(s):  
Alessandro Carlini ◽  
Pierluigi Dalla Rosa ◽  
Bartolomeo Montrucchio ◽  
Ivan Cenci ◽  
Francesca Maria Claudio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Raffaella Gualandi ◽  
Anna De Benedictis

Abstract In this letter to the Editor, we shed light on the rapid changes the Covid-19 virus has generated in hospital management. Recent experiences in the field aim to reorganizing hospital processes and policies. In this new scenario, new patient needs emerge, and a change in the hospital model of care should include them.


Anaesthesia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Olivarius‐McAllister ◽  
M. Pandit ◽  
A. Sykes ◽  
J. J. Pandit

Health Policy ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles L. Bennett ◽  
Daniel Deneffe

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. S153
Author(s):  
Naotaka Okamoto ◽  
Ryu Shutta ◽  
Akihiro Tanaka ◽  
Naoki Mori ◽  
Nobuhiko Makino ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982110471
Author(s):  
Noel Fahed Ayoub ◽  
Karthik Balakrishnan

Objective To improve hospital price transparency, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires, as of January 2021, that all hospitals reveal charges for specific items and services. This analysis investigates whether otolaryngology residency–affiliated hospitals have complied with this new regulation, and it evaluates the variability in hospital-reported charges for pediatric tonsillectomy. Study Design Cross-sectional analysis. Settings Subset of hospitals affiliated with otolaryngology residency programs. Methods Hospital websites were searched to determine compliance rates with CMS guidelines by posting a price transparency tool and specific charges for Current Procedural Terminology code 42820 (tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, <12 years old). Various charges were collected: gross charge, discounted cash price, deidentified minimum and maximum negotiated charges, hospital fees, and physician fees. Results Overall 104 unique hospitals were analyzed: 81 (78%) provided pricing data, but only 28 (27%) complied with CMS guidelines. The median reported total gross charge was $13,239 (range, $600-$41,957); deidentified minimum negotiated charge, $9222 (range, $337-$25,164); and deidentified maximum negotiated charge, $17,355 (range, $1002-$54,987). Hospital fees (median, $11,900; range, $2304-$38,831) were consistently higher than physician fees (median, $1827; range, $420-$5063). All estimates included a disclaimer stating that values likely underrepresent true prices. Conclusion Hospital compliance with the new regulation remains low, which limits efforts toward improved price transparency. There is wide variability in reported charges for pediatric tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.


BMJ ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 340 (jan21 1) ◽  
pp. c88-c88 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Maynard ◽  
K. Bloor

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Scherr ◽  
Donna M. Wilson ◽  
Joan Wagner ◽  
Maureen Haughian

Evidence is needed to validate rapid response teams (RRTs), including those led by nurse practitioners (NPs). A descriptive-comparative mixed-methods study was undertaken to evaluate a newly implemented NP-led RRT at 2 Canadian hospitals. On the basis of data gathered on 255 patients who received an RRT call compared with the patient data for the previous year, no significant differences in the number of cardiorespiratory arrests, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, and hospital mortality were found. In addition, no significant differences in patient outcomes were identified between the NP-led and intensivist physician-led RRT calls. A paper survey revealed that ward nurses had confidence in the knowledge and skills of the NP-led RRT and believed that patient outcomes were improved as a result of their RRT call. These findings indicate that NP-led RRTs are a safe and effective alternative to intensivist-led teams, but more research is needed to demonstrate that RRTs improve hospital care quality and patient outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document